Abstract 5865
Background
The 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) is an established genomic tool to assess recurrence risk and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer. The TAILORx study redefined group boundaries of the RS in node negative women. In the 668 patients of the NSABP-B14 study that formed the validation set of the RS younger age was significantly correlated with distant recurrence and tumour size trended toward significance. High tumour grade remained an independent prognostic factor beyond the RS. In the TAILORx study these higher risk groups were under-represented.
Methods
We compared clinical prognostic parameters of women in South East London with available RS with the TAILORx trial population. Retrospective case note analysis of all identified patients between 2013 and 2018 was completed. Women with nodal involvement were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for comparison with patient characteristics of the TAILORx study.
Results
A total of 269 tests were identified. 42 were excluded for nodal involvement or incomplete clinical data, leaving 227 patients. Differences between the populations are demonstrated for all characteristics and will be presented at the meeting.Table:
263P Patient characteristic
RS | <11 | 11-25 | >26 | ALL |
N (%) | 34 (11) | 142 (67) | 51 (22) | 227 (100) |
Median age (range) | 48 (28-75) | 49 (28-74) | 53 (38-78) | 50 (28-78) |
≤50 yr % | 56 | 56 | 41 | 52 |
Premenopausal % | 59 | 64 | 47 | 59 |
Tumour size in cm Median (IQR) Mean (SD) | 2.0 (1.7-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.5 | 2.1 (1.5-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.8 | 2.2 (1.6-3.0) 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.1 (1.6-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.6 |
Tumour grade % Low Intermediate High | 6 74 21 | 4 63 33 | 0 24 76 | 4 56 41 |
Clinical risk % Low High High (TAILORx) | 35 65 22 | 32 68 26 | 20 80 57 | 30 70 |
Conclusions
Our patients have a higher clinical risk than the TAILORx population. They are younger and have larger, higher grade cancers. This population is under-represented in the TAILORx study which was unable to exclude benefit in the ≤ 50 subset and may thus underestimate benefit from chemotherapy in our population. The current RS reporting is biased towards an older, low-risk population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Gousis: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. H. Kristeleit: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4616 - Alpelisib (ALP) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) by Last Prior Therapy in Patients (pts) With PIK3CA-Mutated Hormone-Receptor Positive (HR+) Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Additional Study Cohort in BYLieve
Presenter: Eva Ciruelos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3592 - PRECYCLE: Impact of CANKADO-based eHealth-support on quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy.
Presenter: Tom Degenhardt
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4168 - Efficacy and safety of oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor fluzoparib in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer
Presenter: Ning Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2785 - Effect of response to last platinum-based chemotherapy in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma in the phase 3 study ARIEL3 of rucaparib maintenance treatment
Presenter: Jonathan Ledermann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3496 - Integrated safety analysis of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer in the treatment and maintenance settings
Presenter: Rebecca Kristeleit
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2844 - Clinical factors associated with prolonged response and survival under olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCA mutated ovarian cancers
Presenter: S.Intidhar Labidi-Galy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1955 - A Prospective Evaluation of Tolerability of Niraparib Dosing Based on Baseline Body Weight (BW) and Platelet (plt) Count: Blinded Pooled Interim Safety Data from the NORA Study
Presenter: Xiaohua Wu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2539 - Evaluation of Niraparib 200 mg/d as Maintenance Therapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Associated Thrombocytopenia in a Real-World US Setting
Presenter: Premal Thaker
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1290 - Niraparib initial dose and its’ management in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Jacek Grabowski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3353 - Results of the 3rd interim analysis of C-Patrol: A non-interventional study on olaparib in German routine clinical practice
Presenter: Jalid Sehouli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract