Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4546 - Efficacy and toxicity of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as induction or palliative treatment in advanced esophageal cancer patients
Presenter: Femke de Man
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5908 - Perioperative chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FLOT) versus Epirubicin, Platinum and Capecitabine or Flourouracil (EOX/ECF) in Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma- Safety and response data from India.
Presenter: Tanuj Chawla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
937 - Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with S-1 plus Cisplatin in Clinically Resectable Type 4 or Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer: OGSG1205
Presenter: Shunji Endo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1119 - Observational Study of the Peritoneal Washing Cytology Positive Gastric Cancer without Gross Peritoneal Metastasis Underwent Radical D2 Gastrectomy.
Presenter: Jun Eul Hwang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3744 - Primary results of multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer (Neo G-SOX PII)
Presenter: Akira Miki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5091 - Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction (GMBH-STO-0114)
Presenter: Kathrin Heinrich
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2891 - A phase I study of Docetaxel/Oxaliplatin/S-1 (DOS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Kei Hosoda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2994 - Apatinib combined with docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a prospective clinical study (Data updated)
Presenter: Mudan Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3000 - A multicenter phase II study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1604)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4653 - Impact of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Versus Paclitaxel on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer That Has Progressed After First-Line Chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-061)
Presenter: Eric Van Cutsem
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract