Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3907 - Exploration of efficacious alternative regorafenib regimens to manage hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR)
Presenter: Axel Grothey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3958 - Quality of Life (QoL) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results of a European Survey
Presenter: Zorana Maravic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3563 - BISQUIT: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1184 - iSCORE: Immunotherapy Sequencing in COlon and REctal Cancer
Presenter: Fiona Turkes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3346 - Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA Study
Presenter: Lisa Salvatore
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3895 - A phase II study of capecitabine plus concomitant radiation therapy followed by durvalumab (MEDI4736) as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer: PANDORA study.
Presenter: Maria Aurelia Barbera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2012 - Open Label Phase III Study of Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin in mFOLFOX-6 for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AGENT
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2198 - SOLSTICE, a phase 3, randomized, open label study of trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (bev) versus capecitabine+bev for the 1L treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for intensive therapy
Presenter: Thierry Andre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2921 - A Phase Ib/ II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CXD101 in Combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic, Previously-Treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (short title CAROSELL)
Presenter: Mark Saunders
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3695 - A Phase 1b/2 Study of Onvansertib (PCM-075) in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a KRAS Mutation
Presenter: Heinz Josef Lenz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract