Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3082 - Prognostic and predictive role of body mass index (BMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analisys of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO
Presenter: Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3618 - Drug holidays and overall survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Silvio Ken Garattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6111 - Quality of life during 1st-line FOLFOXIRI+/- panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the randomized VOLFI trial (AIO KRK-0109)
Presenter: Michael Geissler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1042 - A biomarker combination indicating resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastastic colorectal cancer : results of phase I of the PERMAD trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3291 - Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: meta-analysis
Presenter: James Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2046 - Choosing the right strategy based on individualized treatment effect predictions: Combination versus sequential chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2589 - Noninferiority on overall survival of every-2-weeks vs weekly schedule of cetuximab for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefan Kasper
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4944 - POLAF study: Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of plasmatic prognostic and predictive markers
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2042 - The accuracy of the clinical PCI score in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Nadine De Boer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2667 - The impact of late-line treatment on overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Takeshi Kawakami
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract