Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1398 - Phase 1 study of liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: primary results of dose-escalation part
Presenter: Noboru Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5818 - Polo-like Kinase 1 inhibitor onvansertib synergizes with paclitaxel in breast cancer carrying p53 mutation
Presenter: Antonio Giordano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5927 - Phase 1b study of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, onalespib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced, triple negative breast cancer (NCT02474173).
Presenter: Robert Wesolowski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1695 - Impact of pertuzumab and T-DM1 on prognosis of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and factors affecting their efficacy: results from the AGMT_MBC-Registry
Presenter: Simon Peter Gampenrieder
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1742 - Clinical profile and outcome of HER2 positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with HER2 targeted therapy: Real world experience.
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1846 - Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results of single arm phase IV COMACHI study
Presenter: Norikazu Masuda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5385 - Anti HER-2 Therapies and Left Ventricular Dysfunction The Renaissance Study
Presenter: ANDRES DANIELE
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3320 - Safety and efficacy of T-DM1 in 128 patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer: The Royal Marsden experience.
Presenter: Nicolò Battisti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4540 - Use of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; K) after pertuzumab + trastuzumab (PH) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC): challenges in assessing effectiveness of treatment sequencing in the real world (RW)
Presenter: Thibaut Sanglier
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2376 - Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in patients (pts) with HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) receiving talazoparib (TALA) vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCT) in the EMBRACA trial: A focus on subgroups with/ without visceral disease
Presenter: Johannes Ettl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract