Abstract 5520
Background
Chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) continue to be a clinical problem, particularly in the delayed phase. CINV lack of control worsens the quality of life of patients and it is associated with complications increasing costs for healthcare services. CINV app is a free service addressed to patients treated with emetogenic chemotherapy (CT), empowering patients to report CINV impact in life and relevant information. This study aims to evaluate the usability and acceptability of a smartphone app to improve CINV management in patients receiving CT.
Methods
We used 4‐dimensions test (content, graphic design, navigation and clinical utility) to evaluate APP’s usability and acceptability. Clinical and technical researchers worked together to develop the app’s test. 44 oncology nurses of 33 representative Spanish hospitals were invited to participate (from 31st January to 5th April 2019) enrolling a total amount of 116 oncology patients for testing purposes. After using the app for a chemo cycle the patient was asked to fulfil an online usability test.
Results
Described in the table.Table: CN2
Average of patients that agree for each dimension
Variables | Results (%) |
---|---|
Contents | 81% |
Navigation | 79% |
Graphic design | 83% |
Utility | 90% |
N = 116 Oncology chemo patients level agreement 83% of patients consider this app useful for them and 86% believe it would help to improve CINV management. 94% of patients would recommend it to other patients.
Conclusions
The CINV app addresses main concerns for patients receiving chemotherapy such as the clinical situation and individual emetic risk of patient or complexity of the prescribed antiemetic regimen and impact of CINV in patients daily life. By soliciting feedback from oncology patients, we ensured that the app was acceptable and beneficial for them although some improvement points were suggested. Reporting of symptoms after CT enhances CINV management, self‐care, and participation without being a burden to patients, indicating that app can be used in clinical practice by patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Vifor Pharma España SL.
Funding
Vifor Pharma España SL.
Disclosure
P. Fernandez: Advisory / Consultancy, advisor activities: Vifor Pharma España. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract