Abstract 5495
Background
Digital biomarkers allow for continuous remote patient monitoring and will potentially change the way healthcare is provided and clinical trials are designed. We conducted a study to identify current preferences and interest in digital biomarkers in patients with advanced urological cancers.
Methods
We included 80 patients undergoing systemic therapy for advanced urologic malignancies at our institution. A questionnaire was developed to survey the current access to online information and digital technologies and to rate preferences on a scale from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (fully applies). Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square test and unpaired t-test.
Results
26% of the cohort presented with prostate cancer (PC), 38% with urothelial cancer (UC) and 36% with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). 69% of patients researched medical information about their disease online, 85% of PC patients, 72% of RCC patients, and 53% of UC respectively. 63% of all patients use smartphones and 9% wearables. Smartphone usage is most common in RCC patients (76%) followed by PC (66%) and UC (46%) patients while wearables are used by 7% of RCC, 5% of PC, and 13% of UC patients, respectively. In our cohort RCC patients are younger (Mean 63.3 years) than PC patients (Mean 69.3 years) and UC patients (Mean 68.3 years). The percentage of patients seeking information online and using smartphones or wearables is significantly higher in patients under the age of 75 (p < 0.05). With respect to the information generated by wearables, patients’ interest in activity data is significantly higher (3.5/5) than interest in sleeping profiles (2.5/5; p < 0.01). Patients are more likely to use wearables in clinical trials when they have access to the generated activity data (2.8/5) than using them without gaining access to the information (2.1/5; p < 0.01). Interest in wearable data and willingness to wear them as part of clinical trials are significantly higher for male gender (p < 0.01), and is independent of age and distance between home and the clinical trial site.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates a high engagement of patients in digital technologies. Even though there is a lower penetration rate for digital technologies in older people, interest in digital biomarker data is high in regardless of age group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Severin Rodler.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract