Abstract 1947
Background
NEPA is the first and only fixed oral combination of a long-acting NK1receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3RA, palonosetron. NEPA is approved for prevention of chemotherapy (ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients (pts) receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic ctx (HEC) or moderately emetogenic ctx (MEC). Here we present patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of patients (pts) receiving NEPA as an antiemetic prophylaxis during platin-based chemotherapy in a prospective non-interventional study. This group of patients presents a population at high risk for CINV.
Methods
The ongoing prospective AkyPRO study was designed to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in 2500 pts receiving NEPA for CINV prevention in single or two-day MEC or HEC over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint QoL was recorded by FLIE questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were efficacy, reported by pts and physicians on a 4-point scale; antiemetic rescue medication, and safety.
Results
In this interims analysis 595 pts receiving platin-based ctx were evaluated. PRO data show that ctx-induced vomiting can be controlled very efficiently in the majority of platin-receiving pts. Between 80-90% of pts reported no impact on daily life due to vomiting and between 84-90% of pts had a complete response (no vomiting, no rescue medication) in the 3 analysed cycles, independently of which type of platin-ctx they received. Furthermore, the majority of pts (74%, 81% and 68%, respectively) reported no or mild nausea in the cisplatin-, carboplatin- and oxaliplatin-subgroup in cycle 1. However, even mild nausea seems to have a strong impact on daily life with 40% of pts receiving cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy and 46% of oxaliplatin-receiving pts reporting an impact on daily life due to nausea in cycle 1.
Conclusions
NEPA was proven highly effective in controlling both vomiting and nausea over three cycles of ctx independent of the type of platin administered. Despite the reported MEC classification of oxaliplatin in contrast to the HEC classification of cis- and carboplatin, nausea was more difficult to control in oxaliplatin-receiving patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Riemser Pharma.
Funding
Riemser Pharma.
Disclosure
M. Karthaus: Advisory / Consultancy: Helsinn; Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. J. Schilling: Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3409 - Effect and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Toshihiko Iuchi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3683 - Impact of Radiotherapy on efficacy of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies in metastatic NSCLC
Presenter: Evangeline Samuel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3924 - Pembrolizumab frontline monotherapy in patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression: Real World Data from a European Cohort with focus on subgroups of interest
Presenter: Giannis Mountzios
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3970 - Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression in Germany. Treatment and first outcome from the prospective German Registry Platform CRISP (AIO-TRK-0315)
Presenter: Martin Sebastian
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5350 - The efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy in PD-L1 50% positive advanced NSCLC (HOPE-001)
Presenter: Motohiro Tamiya
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3832 - Osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analysis of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases in a real-world study (ASTRIS)
Presenter: Giulio Metro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4082 - Real-world (RW) treatment patterns and outcomes for second-line (2L) therapy and beyond in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC receiving a first-line (1L) first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Riyaz Shah
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2855 - Impact of ramucirumab (RAM) + erlotinib (ERL) on EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA – The 1st report of a biomarker study in Japanese patients from RELAY: Global Ph3 study of ERL + RAM or placebo (PL) in 1L metastatic NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations
Presenter: Kazuto Nishio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2911 - Apatinib combined with EGFR - TKI in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR - TKI resistance
Presenter: Ruifen Tian
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2100 - Updated analysis of a phase I trial of afatinib (Afa) and bevacizumab (Bev) in chemo-naïve patients (pts) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-mutations: OLCSG1404
Presenter: Takashi Ninomiya
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract