Abstract 4498
Background
Patients’ involvement in the health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making process is important for transparency, legitimacy and fairness. The study objectives were to understand breast cancer patients’ perspectives when choosing their treatment, highlight treatment characteristics valued as most important by patients and gain information on patients’ trade-offs between available treatments.
Methods
A discrete choice experiment survey of breast cancer patients was conducted in Spain, Poland, France and Ireland. The survey design included: literature review, qualitative research, cognitive debriefing, data collection and analysis. A panel of experts from participating countries (physicians, patient group representatives, ex-payers) selected the survey treatment attributes: progression-free survival (PFS), febrile neutropenia (FN), pain, functional well-being (FWB) and out-of-pocket payment (OPP). Patients selected (or opted-out) between two unlabelled hypothetical treatments containing the previously mentioned five attributes. Panels of breast cancer patients were recruited as respondents and the questionnaire was deployed through a website platform. A D-efficient experimental design with 16 choice-sets was constructed and a conditional logistic model was used to estimate patients’ preferences. Marginal rates of substitution (MRS) was used to estimate out-of-pocket payments.
Results
In total, 317 breast cancer patients completed the survey. FWB and pain were the most important attributes chosen by patients. Respondents were willing to pay €17,288 out-of-pocket to move from severe to no impairment in FWB, followed by moderate impairment (€15,297) and from severe pain to no pain state (€15,138). Patients would pay €574 annually for one additional PFS month. Preferences differed by age for FN and FWB; highly educated patients have stronger preference for PFS compared to non-highly educated.
Conclusions
Breast cancer treatments that improve pain, FWB and PFS are considered preferred treatments from patients’ perspective.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Novartis Oncology Region Europe.
Funding
Novartis Oncology Region Europe.
Disclosure
T. Konstantopoulou: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis Oncology. E. Stamuli: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis Oncology Region Europe. D. Ross: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Oncology Region Europe. R. Pacheco: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis Oncology Region Europe.
Resources from the same session
3911 - Defining a SUV decrease cut-off in PET/CT response monitoring after one cycle of preoperative breast cancer chemotherapy
Presenter: Marcin Kubeczko
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1849 - Effect of thioredoxin 1 quantity detection to complement the mammography in breast cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Younju Lee
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2221 - Identification of ultralow risk breast cancer patients (probable overdiagnosis)
Presenter: Salvador Gamez Casado
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5291 - Prevalence of Vitamin D3 deficiency among women with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in an oncology dayward.
Presenter: Warner Finstad
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4247 - Changes in ER pathway activity score during neoadjuvant letrozole to assess therapy response and predict disease free survival (DFS) in ER positive breast cancer patients
Presenter: Arran Turnbull
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
568 - Second primary malignancies in patients with breast cancer.
Presenter: Carlos Erasun Lecuona
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1428 - Phase II randomized trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) with either palbociclib + letrozole (Pal+L) or paclitaxel (Pac) for elderly patients with estrogen receptor & HER2 positive (ER+/HER2+) Breast Cancer (BC) (International Breast Cancer Study Group IBCSG 55-17, TOUCH)
Presenter: Laura Biganzoli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1479 - Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (neoHIP): an open label randomized phase 2 trial
Presenter: Heather McArthur
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1481 - A randomized phase 2 study of peri-operative ipilimumab, nivolumab and cryoablation versus standard care in women with residual, early stage/resectable, triple negative breast cancer after standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Heather McArthur
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4334 - ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030: A phase 3 study of standard adjuvant chemotherapy with or without atezolizumab in early stage triple negative breast cancer.
Presenter: Michail Ignatiadis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract