Abstract 4107
Background
Anti-PD-1 therapy is effective and durable in a subset of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCCRCC). Previous studies have suggested that PBRM1 mutations associate with response to anti-PD-1. Here, we assessed routine, pre-treatment hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides for features of a pre-existing immune response to tumor and tested them for an association with overall survival (OS).
Methods
We studied prospectively-collected pre-treatment biopsies from 56 patients (n = 15 treatment naïve; n = 41 previously failed at least 1 prior anti-angiogenic agent) as part of the CheckMate 009 trial (NCT01358721). H&E-stained slides were scored by two pathologists blinded to patient outcome for features of immune-related pathologic response (irPR, Cottrell, Ann Oncol 2018; Stein, Ann Oncol 2019) and necrosis. Specifically, the co-localization of moderate-high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, plasma cells, lymphoid aggregates, neovascularization, and proliferative fibrosis was scored and compared to OS. 23 patients also had genomic data available for study.
Results
H&E evidence of a pre-existing immune response to tumor (irPR score=1 or 2) associated with improved 5-year OS (median survival undefined at 5 years vs. 16.0 months, log-rank, p = 0.006). Necrosis score alone did not associate with OS, however, a composite score (irPR minus necrosis) distinguished a population of patients with particularly poor OS following anti-PD-1 therapy (median survival 40.5 months vs. 12.3 months, log-rank, p = 0.01). Prior systemic therapy did not affect irPR or necrosis scores (p > 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). Patients positive for both an irPR score of 1 or 2 and PBRM1 mutation had significantly improved OS as compared to patients negative for both (median survival undefined vs. 7.9 months, log-rank p = 0.002).
Conclusions
Pre-treatment H&E slides can be used to predict OS in patients with mCCRCC treated with anti-PD-1 using a routine surgical pathology workflow. Early evidence suggests that the combination of irPR scoring with genomic testing for PBRM1 may further stratify the predictive ability of these assessments beyond either individual approach alone.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01358721.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
NIH T32 CA193145.
Disclosure
S. Signoretti: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, AACR, NCI; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Licensing / Royalties: Biogenex Laboratories. M. Sznol: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca-MedImmune, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Nektar, Lilly, Biodesix, Modulate Therapeutics, Newlink Genetics, Molecular Partners, Innate Pharma, AbbVie, Immunocore, Genmab, Almac, Hinge, Anaeropharma, Array, G; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Amphivena, Intensity Therapeutics, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nextcure, Actym, Torque . Y. Ishii: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. D.F. McDermott: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, Exelixis, Array BioPharma, Alkermes, Inc., Jounce Therapeutics, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Peloton Therapeutics, EMD Serono and Genentech BioOncology, Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Merck, Genentech, Pfizer, Exelixis, Novartis, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes, Inc. and Peloton. T.K. Choueiri: Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Ipsen, Tracon, Genentech, Roche, Roche Products Limited, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Calithera, Analysis Group, Takeda; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca, Alexion, Sanofi/Aventis, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Genentech, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Ipsen, Up-to-Date, NCCN, Analysis Group, NCCN,; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Alexion, Sanofi/Aventis, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Genentech, Heron Therapeutics, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Ipsen, Up-to-Date, NCCN, A. J.M. Taube: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract