Abstract 4107
Background
Anti-PD-1 therapy is effective and durable in a subset of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCCRCC). Previous studies have suggested that PBRM1 mutations associate with response to anti-PD-1. Here, we assessed routine, pre-treatment hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides for features of a pre-existing immune response to tumor and tested them for an association with overall survival (OS).
Methods
We studied prospectively-collected pre-treatment biopsies from 56 patients (n = 15 treatment naïve; n = 41 previously failed at least 1 prior anti-angiogenic agent) as part of the CheckMate 009 trial (NCT01358721). H&E-stained slides were scored by two pathologists blinded to patient outcome for features of immune-related pathologic response (irPR, Cottrell, Ann Oncol 2018; Stein, Ann Oncol 2019) and necrosis. Specifically, the co-localization of moderate-high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, plasma cells, lymphoid aggregates, neovascularization, and proliferative fibrosis was scored and compared to OS. 23 patients also had genomic data available for study.
Results
H&E evidence of a pre-existing immune response to tumor (irPR score=1 or 2) associated with improved 5-year OS (median survival undefined at 5 years vs. 16.0 months, log-rank, p = 0.006). Necrosis score alone did not associate with OS, however, a composite score (irPR minus necrosis) distinguished a population of patients with particularly poor OS following anti-PD-1 therapy (median survival 40.5 months vs. 12.3 months, log-rank, p = 0.01). Prior systemic therapy did not affect irPR or necrosis scores (p > 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). Patients positive for both an irPR score of 1 or 2 and PBRM1 mutation had significantly improved OS as compared to patients negative for both (median survival undefined vs. 7.9 months, log-rank p = 0.002).
Conclusions
Pre-treatment H&E slides can be used to predict OS in patients with mCCRCC treated with anti-PD-1 using a routine surgical pathology workflow. Early evidence suggests that the combination of irPR scoring with genomic testing for PBRM1 may further stratify the predictive ability of these assessments beyond either individual approach alone.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01358721.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
NIH T32 CA193145.
Disclosure
S. Signoretti: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, AACR, NCI; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Licensing / Royalties: Biogenex Laboratories. M. Sznol: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca-MedImmune, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Nektar, Lilly, Biodesix, Modulate Therapeutics, Newlink Genetics, Molecular Partners, Innate Pharma, AbbVie, Immunocore, Genmab, Almac, Hinge, Anaeropharma, Array, G; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Amphivena, Intensity Therapeutics, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nextcure, Actym, Torque . Y. Ishii: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. D.F. McDermott: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, Exelixis, Array BioPharma, Alkermes, Inc., Jounce Therapeutics, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Peloton Therapeutics, EMD Serono and Genentech BioOncology, Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Merck, Genentech, Pfizer, Exelixis, Novartis, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes, Inc. and Peloton. T.K. Choueiri: Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Ipsen, Tracon, Genentech, Roche, Roche Products Limited, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Calithera, Analysis Group, Takeda; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca, Alexion, Sanofi/Aventis, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Genentech, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Ipsen, Up-to-Date, NCCN, Analysis Group, NCCN,; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Alexion, Sanofi/Aventis, Bayer, BMS, Cerulean, Eisai, Foundation Medicine Inc., Exelixis, Genentech, Heron Therapeutics, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Prometheus Labs, Corvus, Ipsen, Up-to-Date, NCCN, A. J.M. Taube: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract