Abstract 5331
Background
Ra-223 demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit and favourable safety profile in mCRPC in the ALSYMPCA study (Parker C et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:213–223). PARABO (NCT02398526) is an ongoing, prospective, observational, non-interventional, single-arm study with a primary objective to evaluate pain response in mCRPC pts treated with Ra-223 in a real-world setting.
Methods
The aim of this interim analysis was to assess the impact of Ra-223 on pain response, with and without the use of opioids. Pain response was determined by the worst pain item on the Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire. A clinically meaningful pain response was defined as an improvement of ≥ 2 points; a 95% exact (Clopper–Pearson) confidence interval was reported.
Results
Of the 346 pts enrolled, 311 were included in the interim safety analysis set, 49% of whom used opioids at any time in the study. At baseline (BL), 185/311 (59.5%) had an ECOG performance status of 1 and 222/304 (73.0%) had ≥6 metastatic lesions (but not a superscan). Lumbar vertebrae, pelvis and thigh were amongst the most frequently reported areas of most pain at BL. During the observation period after Ra-223 treatment, 126/211 (59.7%) pts had a clinically meaningful pain response. Of the pts who used opioids vs those who did not, 62/113 (54.9%) vs 64/98 (65.3%) had a clinically meaningful pain response, and 28/110 (25.5%) vs 19/127 (15.0%) achieved almost complete relief after the third dose of Ra-223, respectively.Table:
860P
Ra-223 without opioid use (n = 160) | Ra-233 with opioid use (n = 151) | All pts (N = 311) | |
---|---|---|---|
BPI-SF change ≥2 at observation,* % (95% CI) | (n = 98) 65.3 (55.0–74.6) | (n = 113) 54.9 (45.2–64.3) | (n = 211) 59.7 (52.8–66.4) |
Pain relief due to pain medications** at third Ra-223 dose,‡ % 0%–20% (no relief) 30%–70% (some relief) 80%–100% (almost complete relief) Missing data | (n = 127) 31.5 25.2 15.0 28.4 | 17.3 47.3 25.5 10.0 | 24.9 35.4 19.8 19.8 |
QoL-Set-Pain-Response (n = 211);
**QoL-Set-BPI-SF (n = 269); †This time point was chosen due to limited study numbers at later doses;
‡According to patients’ answer to the question “In the last 24 hours, how much relief have pain treatments or medications provided?” in the BPI-SF questionnaire.
Conclusions
In this study, reflective of real clinical practice, the majority (73.0%) of pts had multiple lesions at BL and almost half (49%) used opioids. Over half (59.7%) of pts reported a decrease in worst pain after Ra-223 treatment, irrespective of opioid use. Of pts who used vs did not use opioids, 54.9% vs 65.3% achieved a clinically meaningful pain response. Overall, a fifth (19.8%) of pts achieved almost complete relief after the third dose of Ra-223.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02398526.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jenny Feehan of OPEN Health Medical Communications (London, UK), with financial support from Bayer.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bayer Pharma AG.
Funding
Bayer Pharma AG.
Disclosure
H. Palmedo: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. S. Eschmann: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. A. Werner: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. I. Selinski: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. M. Möllers: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. J. Kalinovsky: Full / Part-time employment: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. A. Benson: Full / Part-time employment: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3361 - Providing a nurse-led telephone intervention for patients treated with oral anticancer medication: symptom management and adherence monitoring
Presenter: Etienne Minvielle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3937 - Chronological evaluation of health-related quality of life and physical symptoms in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients up to 12 months
Presenter: Naoko Sato
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5620 - Understanding the patients’ Experiences of Radiation Therapy: A Qualitative Study on Prostate Cancer Patients
Presenter: Sakarias Johansson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1792 - Effect of Kegel exercises on prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy
Presenter: Aydan Uravylioglu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2169 - The Meaning of Responsibility – a Secondary Analysis of Patients and Caregivers Calls to an Oncology Emergency Telephone
Presenter: Heidi Jacobsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4587 - Cognitive function changes and Associated Factors in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
Presenter: Elif Dil
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1981 - Prevention of dental complications in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving bisphosphonates treatment
Presenter: CESCA PUIGMARTI
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2725 - Safety profile of oral netupitant/palonosetron in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.
Presenter: Marina Bosch - Damas
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5112 - Symptomatic and toxicity management of cancer patients using a telephone support model led by the oncology nurse
Presenter: Gemma Simó
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1365 - Symptom cluster of fatigue, sleep disturbance and depression and its impact on quality of life among Chinese breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Xiaole HE
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract