Abstract 5257
Background
FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and Gemcitabine with nab-Paclitaxel (GN) are both proven to be superior to Gemcitabine in first line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, there has been no phase 3 randomized controlled trials to prove FFX is superior to GN in APC. This population-based cohort study was conducted to compare efficacy and safety profiles of the two standard regimens in APC.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated all newly diagnosed patients (pts) with APC who received either FFX or GN as first line therapy during 2010-2018 at three Canadian institutions. The primary objective was to assess survival. Secondary objective was to compare safety profile of the two regimens. Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival curves.
Results
There were 231 eligible pts identified: 143 received FFX and 88 received GN. FFX pts were slightly younger than GN (median age: 62 (IQR: 56-67) vs 66 (IQR: 58-73) respectively). There were predominantly more males: FFX 89 (62.2%) vs GN 46 (52.3%). WHO performance status (PS) of 0 were 38 (28.4%) vs 14 (16.5%) and 1 were 90 (67.2%) vs 65 (76.5%) respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of FFX was 5.5 months (mts) (95% CI: 5.0-6.7) vs 5.1 mts (95% CI: 3.8-7.1) with GN (p = 0.37). The median overall survival (OS) with FFX was 9.3 mts (95% CI: 7.5 – 11.1) vs. 10.2 mts (95% CI: 6.8-11.3) with GN (p = 0.81). On multivariate analysis chemotherapy regimen was not correlated with PFS or OS. There were more grade 3-4 toxicity in FFX vs GN group: diarrhea – 22 (15.4%) vs 3 (3.4%) (p = 0.004), nausea – 20 (14%) vs 6 (6.8%), vomiting – 13 (9.1%) vs 6 (6.8%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) – 8 (5.6%) vs 3 (3.4%), thrombocytopenia – 28 (19.6%) vs 5 (5.7%) (p = 0.003) respectively. Gr 3-4 neutropenia rates were similar in both regimens: 23 (16%) in FFX vs 15 (17%) in GN.
Conclusions
Our results revealed that FFX or GN had comparable survival and safety profiles. Given lower Gr 3-4 toxicity profile of GN regimen, GN is likely preferable choice for majority of pts. FFX could be reserved for young high performance pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Segal Cancer Centre Jewish General Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1049 - The Effect Of Multiple Interventions For Women At Risk For Cervical Cancer On Their Health Responsibility, Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer, And Having Screening: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
Presenter: Busra Altinel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1309 - Quantifying the Effects of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program on Cervical Cancer Mortality
Presenter: Nhung Bui
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1346 - Spread of tumor and adverse events after modified radical hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor diameter preoperatively estimated 2 cm or less: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1101); exploratory analysis before primary analysis.
Presenter: Takahide Arimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5352 - Impact of Combined Interstitial and Intracavitary Brachytherapy in locally advanced Cervical cancer: A Survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2049 - Chemoradiotherapy response prediction model by proteomic expressional profiling in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Chel Hun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1923 - Disparities starting adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer in the international, academic, randomised, phase 3 OUTBACK trial (ANZGOG 0902, RTOG 1174, NRG 0274)
Presenter: Linda Mileshkin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3284 - Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC)
Presenter: Andres Redondo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
843 - Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Xiaobin Gu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1020 - Clinical impact of molecular profiling of cervical cancer (CC) patients (pts) in a dedicated Phase I (P1) unit
Presenter: Mariana Scaranti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
872 - Comparative proteomic profiles of cervical cancer and paried paracancerous tissue and the potential effects of DUSP7 over-expression through inhibiting RAS pathway on the biological characteristics of human cervical cancer cell line SIHA
Presenter: Xuan Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract