Abstract 1096
Background
OncotypeDX (ODX®) can enhance prediction of breast cancer recurrence, guiding adjuvant treatment options. However, the opportunity to access this test is not always possible. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between phenotypical tumor characteristics, quantitative classical immunohistochemistry (IHC) and recurrent score (RS) resulting from ODX®.
Methods
All breast cancer patients who underwent ODX® between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively included in the study. The data selected for analysis were age, menopausal status, pathological and IHC features. IHC was performed with standardized quantitative methods. Dataset was split into two subsets (70% for training and 30% for internal validation). Logistic models were built with statistically significant features for predicting RS ≤ 25 or ≤ 20. An external validation set, provided by another center, was used to test reliability of prediction models.
Results
The internal dataset included 407 patients (Table) who underwent ODX®. Mean age was 53.7 (31-80) and 222 patients (54.55%) were > 50 years old. ODX® results showed: 67 patients (16.6%) between 0-10, 272 patients between 11-25 (66.8%) and 68 pts > 26 (16.6%). At the logistic regression analysis, RS score was significantly associated with ER (p = 0.004), PgR (p < 0.001), and Ki67% (p < 0.001) with the threshold equal to 25. Above patients with RS ≤ 25, the generalized linear regression resulted in a well calibrated model with an AUC of 92.2% (sensitivity 84.2%; specificity 80.1%). External validation set included 180 patients and confirmed the model performance with an AUC of 82.3% and good calibration. A nomogram predicting RS score ≤25 was generated.Table:
261P Tumor characteristics training set + internal test set
Training + internal test set – Tumor characteristics | ||
---|---|---|
Histological subtype classification | Invasive Ductal Carcinoma | 318 pts (78,1%) |
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma | 47 pts (11,5%) | |
Other | 42 pts (10,3%) | |
Grading | 1 | 28 pts (6.8%) |
2 | 268 pts (65,8%) | |
3 | 111 pts (27,3%) | |
pT | 1a | 3 pts (0,7%) |
1b | 38 pts (9,3%) | |
1c | 216 pts (53,1%) | |
2 | 143 pts (35,1%) | |
3 | 6 pts (1,5%) | |
4 | 1 pt (0,3%) | |
pN | 0 | 233 pts (57,2%) |
0i+ | 12 pts (3%) | |
1mic | 43 pts (10,6%) | |
1 | 108 pts (26,5%) | |
NA | 11 pts (2,7%) | |
Mean T diameter [cm] | 1.9 (Range 0,2-8,5) | |
Mean Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) diameter [mm] | 1.7 (Range 0-40) | |
Mean Axillary Lymph Node (ALN) diameter [mm] | 0.8 (Range 0-25) | |
Mean N Ratio | 0.14 (0.00 – 1.00) | |
SLN involvement [n° of nodes] | 0 | 261 pts (64,1%) |
1 | 112 pts (27,5%) | |
2 | 24 pts (5,8%) | |
3 | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
NA | 9 pts (2,2%) | |
ALN involvement [n° of nodes] | 0 | 338 pts (83%) |
0i+ | 4 pts (1%) | |
1mic | 3 pts (0,7%) | |
1 | 31 pts (7,6%) | |
2 | 8 pts (2%) | |
3 | 5 pts (1,2%) | |
5 | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
NA | 17 pts (4,1%) | |
Multifocality | Yes | 97 pts (23,8%) |
No | 300 pts (73,7%) | |
NA | 10 pts (2.5%) | |
Multicentricity | Yes | 20 pts (4,9%) |
No | 376 pts (92,4%) | |
NA | 11 pts (2,7%) | |
PVI | Absent | 242 pts (59,4%) |
Focal | 51 pts (12,5%) | |
Moderate | 32 pts (7,8%) | |
Massive | 59 pts (14,5%) | |
NA | 23 pts (5,6%) | |
Mean ER expression | 87,9% (Range 1-100) | |
Mean PgR expression | 62.2% (Range 0-100) | |
Mean AR expression | 7.7% (Range 0-90) | |
Mean Ki67% expression | 29.8% (Range 0-90) | |
Her2 Expression | 0 | 187 pts (46%) |
1 | 112 pts (27,5%) | |
2 | 104 pts (25,5%) | |
NA | 4 pts (0,9%) | |
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 | Not determined | 300 pts (73,7%) |
Not amplificated | 100 pts (23,7%) | |
Undetermined | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
Equivocal | 1 pt (0,2%) |
Conclusions
Quantitative IHC presents a good correlation with RS score in patients with RS ≤ 25, also in external validation set. A nomogram for physician that enhances a cost/effectiveness clinical approach practice has been developed. Prospective clinical application will be tested in further studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabio Marazzi.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2840 - Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Android:Gynoid Fat Ratio in Breast Cancer Survivors
Presenter: Christina Dieli-Conwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
869 - Impact of Education for Breast self examination in Rural Indian Women on Early Detection - results of POC study
Presenter: Sneha Parchuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1951 - Breast cancer incidence and survival in renal transplant patients: 35-year experience
Presenter: Michalis Kontos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2017 - The changing landscape of breast cancer incidence after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease
Presenter: Amelia Benjamin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1780 - Number of deliveries as a prognostic factor in different breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Anniina Jääskeläinen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4650 - Effects of supervised and adapted exercise program in the quality of life and strength of breast cancer survivors: MAMA MOVE Gaia trial
Presenter: Ana Joaquim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4962 - Study On the Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Affecting the Proportion of Breast Conserving Surgery in Chinese Women Breast Cancer
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5451 - Clinical decision making and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in early breast cancer. Is the agreement between planned and applied therapeutic program?
Presenter: Marco Giavarra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
888 - The value of genetic counselling in breast cancer genetic testing and clinical management
Presenter: Vicki Kiesel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4005 - Elderly patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry
Presenter: Masataka Sawaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract