Abstract 4973
Background
Malignant bowel obstruction can occur in 18% of cases. SEMS can be an alternative to surgery. BV has been associated with bowel perforation but data on the safety of SEMS for occlusive colon cancer during BV-containing regimens are lacking.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of 136 patients with malignant bowel obstruction who underwent placement of SEMS between 2012 and 2017 in two hospitals. Chemotherapy and BV-containing regimens, stent-related complications and outcomes were recorded.
Results
58 (42.6%) SEMS were placed as a bridge to surgery and 78 (57.4%) as a palliative intent for stage IV disease. 129 patients (94.9%) had a left-sided obstruction. Technical success was achieved in 133 of 136 (98%). Overall, major stent-related complications after two-weeks of insertion were observed in 36 patients (26.5%): Re-obstruction in 18 patients (50%), 11 perforations (30.5%), 5 bleeding (14%) and 2 migrations (5.5%). Complications in the metastatic group (n = 78) 14 (18%) had re-obstructions, 7 (9%) perforations, 4 (5%) minor bleeding and 2 (2.5%) migrations. Multivariate analysis identified stage IV and chemotherapy as significant risk factors for stent-related complications. Patients who received systemic therapy are more likely to develop complications (OR 1.84; CI95% 1.29-6.22, p = 0.0007). 16 patients received BV, 2 (12.5%) had a perforation. Univariate analysis did not show that BV was more likely to develop perforations, although the incidence was higher in this subset of patients. No differences were observed between chemotherapy alone and BV in overall complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant longer OS for patients treated with systemic therapy (27 vs. 11 months, p = <0.00001). There is a significant benefit of BV compared to chemotherapy alone (43 vs. 39 months, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
Placement of SEMS is effective and relatively safe but, with an overall complication rate of 26%. The major early risk is perforation that can increase up to 12% during BV treatment. In patients with obstructing advanced colorectal cancer that would benefit from SEMS, we should consider the risks associated with systemic therapies, taking into account the improvement in survival with BV.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2670 - Molecular subtypes of metastatic(met) gastric cancer(GC) (MoTriGastric): new biomarkers closer to the clinics
Presenter: Maria Alsina Maqueda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3797 - Exploring candidate signal transduction pathways for targeted therapy in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Aafke Creemers
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5485 - Clinical implication of CLDN18, RhoGAP, and E-cadherin in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma
Presenter: Hyunho Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1970 - Identification of a spectrum of germline mutations for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer in the Russian population by next-generation sequencing.
Presenter: IRINA EFIMOVA
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4989 - The molecular profiling and prognostic value of Chinese gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients
Presenter: Jia Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
7145 - A phase 2 basket study of MCLA-128, a bispecific antibody targeting the HER3 pathway, in NRG1 fusion-positive advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Alison Schram
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1406 - Simultaneous Resection of Pancreatic Cancer and Liver Oligometastases After Induction Chemotherapy in Stage IV Patients:an Open-Label Prospective Randomized Multicenter phase 3 trial(CSPAC-1)
Presenter: Miaoyan Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1530 - Multicenter randomized phase II trial of 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with or without liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) as second-line therapy after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis): NIFTY trial
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1563 - A randomized phase II study of Maintenance therapy with multiepitope vaccine Tedopi (OSE2101) ± nivolumab or FOLFIRI after induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX in patients (Pts) with advanced Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) (TEDOPaM – PRODIGE 63 GERCOR study)
Presenter: Cindy Neuzillet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2780 - A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: TOPAZ-1
Presenter: Do-Youn Oh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract