Abstract 5942
Background
Fatigue represents a complex and frequent symptom in cancer patients and influences their quality of life. Although nurses consider the initial evaluation of the patient to be fundamental, this problem is underestimated in clinical practice and often leads to under-treatment. In addition, the patients and their families still often do not report the symptom because they fear that it will lead to a reduction or suspension of treatment or they think that the symptom is inevitable.
Methods
Mixed methods study. Data were collected using Brief Fatigue Inventory, patients’ interviews, focus groups with nurses and analysis of patients’ records. The setting is represented by two impatient departments of Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS 22.0. For the interviews and focus groups, the analysis processes were conducted according to conventional content analysis using Nvivo 10 software.
Results
71 questionnaires were analysed, 39 males and 32 females. The mean age was 65,7±14 years. Fatigue was reported 5 times (7%) in nursing documents and 17 times problems fatigue was reported by nurses 5 times (7%) in patients’ records, while in 17 cases (23.9%) related problems were reported. 12 patients were interviewed. Five themes were identified: feeling powerless and aggressive, my strategies or what helps me, feeling reassured by the presence of family members, feeling reassured by nurses’ gesture, to be informed. Three themes were identified from nurses focus group: objectivity and subjectivity in the assessment of asthenia, nursing contribution in the multidisciplinary management of asthenia and difficulty in evaluating outcomes.
Conclusions
A not systematic approach to the management of fatigue emerges. Patients are satisfied with the care received but would like more information and specific interventions. Quantitative and qualitative results seem converge. Fatigue is still an underestimated problem in clinical practice. Specific training interventions for health professionals are needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific Research Advisory Board (ABREOC).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract