Abstract 5268
Background
N is a standard of care for patients with mccRCC after failure of a TKI. Nevertheless, nearly 45% of pts had a progressive disease (PD) as best response and PFS was disappointing. In this study we sought to describe a “real-world” cohort of pts with mRCC treated with N beyond first progression to identify factors predicting a clinical benefit.
Methods
We included in a retrospective study all consecutive mRCC pts who received at least one N injection at a French single-center between 2013 and 2018. Clinical and biological data were collected prospectively. Radiological evaluations were done by CT-scan using iRECIST. Characteristics of pts who with unconfirmed PD (iuPD) were described and compared according to the continuation of N beyond iuPD or not. Pts with a clinical benefit (CB) (objective response (OR=CR+PR) or stable disease (SD)) from N post-iuPD, were compared with pts with icPD as best response (BOR) post-iuPD.
Results
109 patients were included, 84% had a clear cell histology; IMDC’s favorable, intermediate and poor prognostic groups at N initiation were 21%, 52% and 27%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24.4 months [14.9-NA], median PFS and OS were 6.03 months [4.6-10] and 25.8 months [24.2-30.1] respectively. ORR was 18.4% (3.7% CR) and 74 pts experienced a first iuPD, including 5 clinical PD. Among the 69 radiological iUPD, 12 had new lesions (16%), 32 had progression of pre-existing lesions (43%) and 25 had both (33%). 36 pts (49%) received N beyond PD. Responses post-iuPD were 3 (4%) PR, 14 (19%) SD and 17 (23%) icPD.; they were more frequently ECOG-PS 0-1 (86% versus 47%, p = 0.0005), had better IMDC group (FAV+INT = 86% vs 53%, p = 0.01) and had higher lymphocyte count (p = 0.04). 17/18 (48%) pts had a CB with N post-iuPD, with a better OS than those without CB (31.8 months vs 24.9 months, p = 0.02). The only factor associated with the absence of CB were LDH>200 (p = 0.038).
Conclusions
We report the largest analysis of treatment with N beyond progression in a real world cohort of mRCC supporting that pseudo-progression is a rare event (4%). We show also that treatment beyond progression is very common (49%) and that LDH>200 might be the better ready-to-use predictive factor of a lack of CB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yann-Alexandre Vano.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Fournier: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Invectys; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips; Research grant / Funding (institution): Evolucare; Research grant / Funding (institution): ArianaPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Imagia. C. Thibault: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. Y. Vano: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4543 - Long-term real-world (RW) outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with ipilimumab (IPI) and non-IPI therapies: IMAGE study
Presenter: Stéphane Dalle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4523 - Prognostic Factors for efficacy of Ipilimumab used after AntiPD1 and/or BRAF+MEK inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: an Italian Melanoma Intergroup study
Presenter: Riccardo Marconcini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3632 - Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 (IPI+PD1) in metastatic melanoma after acquired resistance to IPI+PD1 immunotherapy
Presenter: Adriana Hepner
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3732 - Clinicopathologic characteristics of immune colitis in melanoma patients treated with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 (IPI+PD1) and PD1 monotherapy.
Presenter: Kazi Nahar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5005 - Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands
Presenter: Michiel van Zeijl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5524 - Utilization of Real-World Data to Assess the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: D Scott Ernst
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5884 - Tumor mutational burden and response to PD-1 inhibitors: an analysis of 89 cases of metastatic melanoma.
Presenter: Léa Dousset
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3120 - Increase in S100B and LDH as early outcome predictors for non-responsiveness to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2157 - Immune status defined by molecular information layers predicts response to pembrolizumab treatment in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Guillermo Prado-Vázquez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract