Abstract 2144
Background
Some authors have suggested that the immunological response to postoperative infectious complications (ICs) enhances the viability of undetectable residual tumor cells after surgery, thereby inducing disease recurrence. We hypothesize that recurrence might not occur if neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment of micrometastases can prevent residual cancer cell growth. We evaluated whether or not NAC exerted prophylactic effects against the negative prognostic impact induced by postoperative ICs and assessed its interaction among subgroups of histological response.
Methods
We retrospectively examined 111 patients who received NAC followed by radical esophagectomy between January 2011 and September 2015. Risk factors for the recurrence-free survival (RFS) were examined by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Pathological responders to NAC were defined as those with a tumor disappearance of more than one-third of the initial tumor. Postoperative ICs were defined using the Clavien–Dindo classification.
Results
A pathological response to NAC was observed in 54 (48.6 %) patients. Forty-five patients (40.5%) developed postoperative ICs. The 3-year RFS were 68.8% in the patients who developed ICs and 38.6% in the patients who did not developed ICs (p = 0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that postoperative ICs were a significant independent risk factor for the RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.368; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.256-4.465, p = 0.008). In the subset analysis, in responders, the 3-year RFS were 63.2% in the patients who developed ICs and 71.5% in the patients who did not developed ICs (p = 0.524). In non-responders, the 3-year RFS were 29.3% in the patients who developed ICs and 65.4% in the patients who did not developed ICs (p = 0.006). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that postoperative ICs were a significant independent risk factor for RFS in the non-responders (HR, 2.632; 95% CI, 1.072-6.467, p = 0.035) but not in the responders (HR, 1.480; 95% CI, 0.469-4.667, p = 0.503).
Conclusions
These results suggested that response to NAC can eliminate the poor prognosis induced by postoperative ICs in esophageal cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3668 - Patient Demographics and Management Landscape of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Third Line Setting: real-world data in an Australian Population
Presenter: Sandy Tun Min
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3907 - Exploration of efficacious alternative regorafenib regimens to manage hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR)
Presenter: Axel Grothey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3958 - Quality of Life (QoL) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results of a European Survey
Presenter: Zorana Maravic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3563 - BISQUIT: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1184 - iSCORE: Immunotherapy Sequencing in COlon and REctal Cancer
Presenter: Fiona Turkes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3346 - Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA Study
Presenter: Lisa Salvatore
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3895 - A phase II study of capecitabine plus concomitant radiation therapy followed by durvalumab (MEDI4736) as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer: PANDORA study.
Presenter: Maria Aurelia Barbera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2012 - Open Label Phase III Study of Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin in mFOLFOX-6 for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AGENT
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2198 - SOLSTICE, a phase 3, randomized, open label study of trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (bev) versus capecitabine+bev for the 1L treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for intensive therapy
Presenter: Thierry Andre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2921 - A Phase Ib/ II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CXD101 in Combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic, Previously-Treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (short title CAROSELL)
Presenter: Mark Saunders
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract