Abstract 5678
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has relatively sensitive and specific serum tumor antigen markers (AFP), which is also the most common serological marker for cancer screening. However, there are unignorable limitations, including possible false-negatives/positives owing to confounding conditions. Reliable non-invasive diagnostics is still in urgent need. This work proposes a novel LDI-TOF-MS technique for HCC screening and diagnosis. By taking advantage of 3D nanostructures and machine learning, our technique enables high fidelity and reproducibility.
Methods
An LDI-TOF-MS platform was established for HCC screening and was applied to 139 patients with liver cancer, as well as 203 healthy controls (Table). All mass spectrum was collected within a mass range of 100 to 1,100 Da for metabolites. Based on the data acquired by LDI-TOF-MS, SVM algorithm was developed and applied for automated cancer classification across six cancer types, which was further validated by single blinded samples with randomly selected cancer patients and controls.Table: 1432P
Summary of patient and healthy control characteristics
Patient Type | N | Gender | Gender | Age | AJCC Stage | AJCC Stage | AJCC Stage | AJCC Stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M(%) | F(%) | I | II | III | IV | |||
HCC | 139 | 120 (86.33%) | 19 (13.67%) | 55.63± 11.22(25-80) | 51 | 48 | 40 | - |
HC | 203 | 117 (57.64%) | 86 (42.36%) | 47.68± 10.78(23-76) | - | - | - | - |
Results
This assay demonstrated an average sensitivity of 96% and a specificity over 98% in detecting HCC. In our cohort, 47 of 137 HCC patients (35.77%) were AFP negative (AFP<20ng/ml, stage I n = 18, stage II n = 17 and stage III n = 12). Here, we showed that the LDI-TOF-MS recognized almost all AFP-negative HCC. The sensitivity and specificity were obviously superior to AFP in HCC: only 2 of 137 HCCs (1.46%) were misclassified as healthy controls. In contrast, AFP positive and AFP negative HCCs were not readily distinguished by this method. Therefore, this method was independent of tumor markers.
Conclusions
This work established a low-cost, high-throughput procedure based on trace amount of serum to identify HCC as well as healthy controls with superior precision, making it a promising technique for clinical cancer research and translation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract