Abstract 2306
Background
Spatial localization of TILs has been shown to correlate with immunotherapy response. Chromogenic IHC (cIHC) enables assessment of lineage (eg, CD8) or immune checkpoint expression (eg, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain–containing-3 [TIM-3]). Codetection of lineage and checkpoint molecules may help to better inform responders to checkpoint inhibitors, but colocalization is challenging by cIHC. Fluorescence (fIHC) allows colocalization but not spatial assessment and is not an approved CDx platform. Consequently, CDxs have been limited to single-plex cIHC assays. We developed a multiplex cIHC platform that enables image analysis colocalization and spatial assessment of TILs.
Methods
Image analysis of cIHC via HALO software was performed to detect colocalized CD8 and TIM-3. We compared % TIM-3+/CD8+ by cIHC to TIL multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) on 10 procured renal cell carcinoma (RCC) samples. Pathologist annotation and a trained random forest machine-learning tissue classifier were used to determine spatial localization (tumor vs peritumoral vs nontumor) of CD8+ and TIM-3+/CD8+ TIL subsets. We also performed a validated fIHC assay, including CD8 and TIM-3, on 5 additional procured RCC samples.
Results
High concordance (r = 0.92) was observed between % TIM3+/CD8+ TILs measured by cIHC and MFC. Image analysis showed that within the CD8+ population, median % TIM-3+/CD8+ TILs were primarily intratumoral (18.0%), with fewer in peritumoral (9.4%) and nontumoral (6.4%) regions (intratumoral vs peritumoral, and intratumoral vs nontumor, both P = 0.015). TIM-3/CD8 coexpression detection appeared similar between cIHC and fIHC.
Conclusions
We developed a multiplex cIHC method that enables simultaneous quantitation of TIL subpopulations, checkpoint expression, and spatial analysis. cIHC, fIHC and MFC performed similarly in coexpression detection, but only multiplex cIHC enabled spatial localization. Specifications of this assay show promise for development as a CDx. Additional data will demonstrate the capability to substitute TIM-3 with other markers, suggesting an assay template for other lineage/target combinations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Amrita Dervan, MSc, and Jay Rathi, MA, of Spark Medica Inc, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Funding
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
S. Ely: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. G. Lee: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. L. Menard: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. J. Yan: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. P. Fischer: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. B. Kakrecha: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. D. Locke: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. P. Patah: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. K. Urbanska: Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract