Abstract 1698
Background
Although gemcitabine plus nab–paclitaxel (GnP) is a standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer as the result of phase III trial ((MPACT), its therapeutic benefit for elderly patients is unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of GnP for these patients.
Methods
We retrospectively enrolled patients aged > =75 years in whom GnP was initiated as first–line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer between December 2014 and December 2016. Overall survival and progression–free survival according to disease status were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method. Objective response was estimated according to RECISTv1.1. Adverse events were evaluated according to based on the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version4.0. The incidence of adverse events and early discontinuation (i.e., treatment discontinuation due to adverse events within 2 months from initiation) was compared via Fishers’ exact test for univariate analysis and via logistic regression model with step wise method for multivariate analysis.
Results
The cohort comprised 116 selected patients with a median age of 77 years (range: 75–84 years). Within a median follow-up of 13 months, the median overall survival and progression-free survival of locally advanced cancer patients were 21.8 and 12.1 months, respectively. In patients with metastasis, these were 13.3 and 5.9 months. The response rate was 31% and the disease control rate was 81%. Within the first 2 months of treatment, grade 4 hematological and grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicities were observed in 10 and 23 patients, respectively. Early treatment discontinuation of GnP occurred in 12 patients, and the associated risk factors were age > =80 years [odds ratio (OR), 9.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.25–39.60] and serum albumin <35 g/L (OR, 5.12; 95% CI, 1.11–23.61).
Conclusions
GnP in selected patients aged > =75 years showed acceptable toxicities and comparable effectiveness to that in the previous studies of the non-elderly population, but patients aged > =80 years and with serum albumin <35 d/L should be carefully assessed for treatment eligibility.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Satoshi Kobayashi.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Ozaka: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): EA Pharma. S. Kobayashi: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Boston Scientific; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer Yakuhin; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult Honsha; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takara Bio; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Beigene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda. M. Ikeda: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer Yakuhin; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Honoraria (self): Otsuka Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Nobel Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self): EA Pharma; Honoraria (self): Kaken Pharmaceutical; Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceutical; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takara-Bio. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Beigene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novel pharma; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takara Bio.
Resources from the same session
3191 - The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria of the phase 3 trial (REFLECT trial) and those with BCLC Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma - A nationwide multicenter study in Japan-
Presenter: Azusa Sakamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1529 - Prognostic and predictive value of baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with ramucirumab from two phase 3 studies (REACH, REACH-2)
Presenter: Andrew Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2767 - Effect of second-line cabozantinib on health states for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) after sorafenib: QTWiST analysis from the CELESTIAL study
Presenter: Nicholas Freemantle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2150 - Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase 3 RESORCE trial
Presenter: Jordi Bruix
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3437 - Phase I/II trial of NBTXR3 activated by SBRT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis
Presenter: Marc Pracht
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1758 - Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first-line sorafenib across age subgroups in two global phase 3 trials (REACH and REACH-2)
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1192 - Ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP): An exposure–response analysis
Presenter: Josep Llovet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1600 - Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated with Nivolumab: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience.
Presenter: Sirish Dharmapuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2364 - Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma (AC) or Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus as Second-Line Therapy: Analysis of the Chinese Subgroup in KEYNOTE-181
Presenter: Jia Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1933 - A national comparative effectiveness study to assess definitive chemoradiation regimens in proximal oesophageal squamous cell cancer
Presenter: Judith de Vos-Geelen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract