Abstract 3129
Background
The tumor suppressor TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in solid tumors. Although TP53 decides cell fate and governs initiation of apoptosis, inhibitors targeting mutant TP53 did not yet reached clinical use. Our goal was to identify new potential therapeutic targets in TP53 mutant solid tumors by in silico analysis of multiple large, independent next-generation sequencing and gene chip datasets.
Methods
First, gene expression and mutation data from multiple solid tumors were collected from TCGA and METABRIC databases. Samples were separated based on TP53 mutation status, mutational type and tumor type to identify targetable genes. Differential gene expression was compared using Mann-Whitney test between the mutated (disruptive mutations only) and wild type patient cohorts across all genes. Then, the prognostic value of identified genes was validated in a gene chip-based dataset obtained from the GEO repository. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Significance threshold was set at p < 0.01. Finally, False Discovery Rate was computed to correct for multiple hypothesis testing.
Results
The TCGA dataset include 9,720 patients (21 different cancer types), the Metabric dataset (breast cancer) 1,399 patients, and the GEO dataset (breast, lung, and brain tumors) 7,386 patients. Only genes with higher expression in the TP53 mutant cohort were selected and the list of the top targets was further filtered to include only druggable kinases. The best performing kinases include MPS1 (p = 2.9E-58, FC = 2.82), PLK1 (p = 2.6E-55, FC = 2.55), MELK (p = 5.2E-54, FC = 2.81), and AURKB (p = 2E-53, FC = 3.23). Each of these kinases had a significant prognostic power as well. Of the top 2 (MPS1 and PLK1), both have multiple inhibitors available (for other indications) with PLK1 closest to the clinical use.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that MPS1 (monopolar spindle 1 kinase) and PLK1 (polo like kinase 1) kinases are the strongest druggable targets in TP53 mutant solid tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Semmelweis University.
Funding
National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract