Abstract 829
Background
there is little solid evidence of the effectiveness of psychological interventions using MBRS program for those with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and potential benefits of MBSR for pt with cancer pain in early palliative care.
Methods
Main inclusion criteria were: advanced cancer pt in early palliative care; NRS >3;PS >60% according to Karnosky, informed consent. 20 advanced cancer pt were enrolled. Each session included different forms of mindfulness meditation practice, mindful awareness during yoga postures and mindfulness during stressful situations. Participants enter upon enrolling into a commitment to carry out daily 45-min homework assignments .A dedicate nurse with experience in palliative care attended each mindfulness session. Primary outcome was total pain at the end of MBSR intervention evaluated by both VAS and ESAS scales. Secondary outcome was mood state change evaluated by POMS questionnaire. Satisfaction of treatment and compliance were also evaluated. All questionnaires along with a form for collecting personal and clinical data were administered by nurse at baseline and at the end of MBSR intervention.
Results
19 out of 20 were female with median age 54 years old. 56% were receiving morphine for cancer pain. Preliminary results did show slight reduction in total pain score which however was not statistically significant. The POMS test showed significant changes in the mean scores indicating a statistically significant improvement of mood at the end of mindfulness sessions. Compliance program and homework was 70% while pt satisfaction was 78%.
Conclusions
This program appears to be feasible and well accepted. The improvements in the mood state suggests that the mindfulness techniques could play a role in helping patients to reduce mood disturbance. The role of nurse was optimal to allow critically ill patients to participate in MBRS and to guarantee adherence and satisfaction. Moreover nurse was very helful to support the mindfulness trainer in managing cancer patients according to their physical needs. Finally the presence of nurse has been evaluated by patients as part of cancer caring.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabrizio Artioli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract