Abstract 4672
Background
KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is essential to guide treatment and prognostication. Multiple gene profiling assays are available, each with differing tumour sample size/quality requirements and turnaround time (TAT). Many UK hospitals send samples to off-site labs for profiling. A rapid TAT is desirable to plan appropriate chemotherapy +/- biologics from cycle one, as well as providing certainty and satisfaction for patients and clinicians.
Methods
This study was conducted at 2 UK tertiary cancer centres (University College London Hospital and Mount Vernon Hospital), comparing a pathway where gene profiling of mCRC was performed off-site using an NGS platform versus on-site testing using the Idylla platform (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium). Up to 50 patients were included in each group with 8 of the Idylla tests being used for samples that had failed with the NGS platform.
Results
Mutational profiling results for the whole cohort that were successfully tested (n = 84) showed 26% (22/84) were wildtype for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, 62% (52/84) KRAS mutated, 2% (2/84) NRAS mutated, 10% (8/84) BRAF mutated. The median TAT in days (median, interquartile range (IQR)) of the on-site Idylla pathway was shorter than the off-site NGS pathway (4, 1 - 6 vs. 15, 13-17; p = <0.0001). In the off-site group median time from request to receipt of sample was 3 days (IQR 2 - 5) and median time from receipt to result was 10 days (IQR 9 - 13). Test failure rate was significantly higher with the NGS test (30%, 15/50) compared to the Idylla test (2%, 1/50) (p = 0.0001). 8 samples that had failed testing with the NGS platform, due to insufficient/low quality of sample, were all successfully tested with the Idylla platform.
Conclusions
For gene profiling of mCRC, on-site testing with the Idylla platform significantly shortened the TAT, lowered failure rate and was able to test more sub-optimal samples compared to off-site NGS testing. Updated results integrating these data with tumour location, MMR status and treatment outcomes will be presented at ESMO 2019.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Biocartis provided the Idylla test kits for this study without charge.
Disclosure
N. Bhuva: Honoraria (self), supported in attending international meetings: Amgen; Honoraria (self), supported in attending international meetings: Bristol-Myers Squibb. K. Shiu: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, supported in attending lectures and conferences: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, supported in attending lectures and conferences: Merck Group; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, supported in attending lectures and conferences: Servier; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, supported in attending lectures and conferences: Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5472 - Early response evaluation and CEA response in patients treated in a Danish randomized study comparing trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with or without bevazicumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Camilla Qvortrup
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2037 - Updated survival analysis of the randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (SALTO) by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
Presenter: Johannes Kwakman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3053 - JFMC51-1702-C7: Phase II study investigating efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies.
Presenter: Keisuke Kazama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3183 - Bevacizumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC 1602): A single-arm, Phase 2 study
Presenter: Akitaka Makiyama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3233 - Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab as a Third-Line Chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (TAS-CC4 study)
Presenter: Yoichiro Yoshida
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5907 - Liquid biopsy concordance based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Pashtoon Kasi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1866 - Plasma clearance of RAS mutation under therapeutic pressure is a rare event in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Emilie Moati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2312 - High Circulating miR-1247 is a marker for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab
Presenter: Jakob Schou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5602 - Clinical relevance of circulating tumor (ct)DNA genotyping for first line cetuximab-based treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a prospective multicentric study
Presenter: JOANA Vidal Barrull
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3182 - Clonal hematopoiesis mutations in plasma cfDNA RAS/BRAF genotyping of metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Beili Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract