Abstract 3529
Background
Patients with multiple large brain metastases (LBMs) are subject to cause intracranial hypertension, which remains a clinical difficulty so far. The present study is to investigate whether staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a feasible solution to improve clinical symptoms and life quality in palliative management.
Methods
Patients with brain metastases treated between 1 January 2016 and 30 March 2019 were retrospectively studied. The patients inclusion criteria included were: 1) metastatic lesions ≥ 3; 2) tumor lesions with a supratentorial invasion ≥ 3 cm or a subtentorial invasion ≥ 2 cm; 3) with neurological impairment or with a high risk for intracranial hypertension. The first stage of SRS dose regimens for utmost risk supratentorial lesions were 20-24Gy within 2-fractions (fx); whereas 24Gy/3-fx for subtentorial lesions. For the 2nd stage, the rest metastatic lesions with relatively lower risk were treated with 16-18Gy/1-fx one week after that.
Results
A total of 30 patients were enrolled included in this study. The neurological symptoms were significantly relieved following 1st stage of SRS, with a median period of 3 days (2-14 days). 13 out of 30 patients were randomly selected for MR imaging two weeks after SRS. It suggested that 84.6% (11/13) of the patients were observed with a clear reduction of tumor volume. The median reduced diameter was 0.38 (0.17-0.83) cm and a median volume reduction was 3.22 (0.01-9.08) mm3. According to RANO-BM, the objective remission rate of utmost risk lesions was 100%, whereas the less critical lesions was 95.16% (59/62). One patient (3.33%) was identified with acute adverse reaction (> grade 3).
Conclusions
Staged SRS with a priority for utmost risk lesions was indicated to be an effective approach for multiple large brain metastases. Further prospective study is highly warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4321 - Health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma survivors treated with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition: a matched cohort study
Presenter: Annelies Boekhout
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
779 - Capecitabine vs Cisplatin along with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable lower esophageal cancers focusing on TWISTT score and QOL
Presenter: Goutham Anugu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5914 - Cancer, Mental Health and End Life Simulation (CAMhELS): A novel effectiveness evaluation.
Presenter: Asanga Fernando
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2597 - Cancer patients’ expectations and understanding about their disease
Presenter: Mónica Pinho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5187 - Impact of patients’ death on oncologists and coping strategies: An online survey
Presenter: Soumaya Labidi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4579 - Clinical benefit from late lines of therapy offered to patients treated in a tertiary referral centre
Presenter: Andrea Sbrana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5058 - Preparedness for caregiving in caregivers of cancer patients
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5917 - Oncologic Emergency Medicine in the real world: A survey and proposal for improvement
Presenter: Carintia Dorta Pérez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4077 - The Reality of Critical Cancer Patients in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit
Presenter: Tiago Filipe Da Cruz Tomas
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract