Abstract 3655
Background
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and surgery may be one of the most important strategy for the treatment of lung cancer patients. However, the procedure of lung cancer diagnosis from initial suspicion to final confirmation is not efficient due to low sensitivity of current diagnostic methods and difficulties involved in tumor tissue biopsy in lung cancer compared to other cancer types. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of liquid biopsy using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis for the better diagnosis of lung cancer.
Methods
In this study, we blindly analyzed both CTCs and ctDNA in the blood samples derived from 109 patients including histology-proven and clinically suspicious lung cancer patients to test the sensitivity of liquid biopsy methods. CTC analysis was done by CytoGen’s liquid biopsy platform, in which viable CTCs were isolated by size-based filtration with gravity and validated by immunostaining of EpCAM or CK, excluding CD45 positive cells and enumerated by CytoGen’s cell imaging software. Lung cancer diagnosis was predicted by a cut-off, 2 ≥ CTC in 5 ml peripheral blood. For ctDNA analysis, EDGC F-Can platform was used to analyze single nucleotide variations of very low variant allele frequencies by utilizing unique molecular indexes and a novel read error correction algorithm. For comparison, we also analyzed the levels of conventional tumor markers (CEA, cyfra21-1 and NSE) in the patient cohort.
Results
Compared to the diagnostic sensitivities of conventional tumor markers (CEA 29%; cyfra21-1 41%; NSE 39%), both assays of CTCs and ctDNA showed higher diagnostic sensitivity in predicting primary lung cancer (CTCs 67%; ctDNA 83%). When the assays of CTCs and ctDNA were combined for the diagnosis, the sensitivity was increased up to 98%.
Conclusions
Collectively, this study suggests that combined CTCs and ctDNA assay would be useful for the diagnosis of primary lung cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Cytogen, Inc., EDGC, Inc., Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center
Funding
Has not received any funding
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract