Abstract 4328
Background
The treatment of cancer has improved and many of the patients’ will return to work. Cancer treatments can have significant impact on work- and functional abilities creating challenges for return to work. Occupational health care services have an important role in supporting patients’ Return-to-Work-process. The purpose of the study was to a) explore cancer patients experiences on support received from occupational health services and b) explore how the services need to be developed.
Methods
Qualitative approach with thematic interview as data collection method was used to explore breast cancer patientś experiences (N = 8). The data was analysed by using thematic content analysis. Five of the cancer patients interviewed had already returned to work after cancer treatments and three were returning work in short period of time.
Results
The main challenges cancer patients confronted formed four categories; factors related to work, workplace, cancer and treatment types and to individual factors. The experienced support by occupational health services varied. The requirement to assess ability to work in the time of 90 sickness days was filled and planning the return-to-work in collaboration between occupational health care, cancer patient and employer occurred in most cases. However, otherwise, the role was passive and patients wished to have more contact with professionals working in the occupational health services.
Conclusions
Previous research highlights the need of collaboration between cancer patients and occupational health care services. Based on the study results, this collaboration needs to be enhanced. Occupational health care providers need to co-ordinate more actively the return-to-work -processes even the special health care is responsible for cancer treatments. From individual perspective, information, psychosocial support and regular evaluation of ability to work are forms of services cancer patient need from the occupational services for successful Return-to-Work. Results of this study can be used to developing occupational health services in national and international context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Turku University of Applied Sciences.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1908 - Androgen Receptor (AR) Aberrations in Patients (Pts) With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC) Treated With Apalutamide (APA) Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in TITAN
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4058 - 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
Presenter: Anouk de Jong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2226 - Spatial-Temporal Change in Quantitative Total Bone Imaging (QTBI) and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Treated With Enzalutamide (ENZA)
Presenter: Glenn Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5795 - Efficacy of Enzalutamide in Hormone-sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Clinical Utility of 18F-Choline PET and Whole Body MRI.
Presenter: Susanne Osanto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
899 - Urine extracellular vesicle GATA2 mRNA alone and in a multigene test predicts initial prostate biopsy result
Presenter: Jungreem Woo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3094 - Circulating tumor cell (CTC) genomic landscape in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) by single cell copy number analysis
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2527 - Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) count and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response measures in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Docetaxel (Doc)
Presenter: Rebeca Lozano Mejorada
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6106 - Assessing the clinical relevance of drug–drug interactions (DDI) with darolutamide (DARO)
Presenter: Christian Zurth
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2237 - KEYNOTE-921: phase 3 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus docetaxel and prednisone for enzalutamide (enza)- or abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2241 - KEYNOTE-641: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Enzalutamide for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Julie Graff
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract