Abstract 5905
Background
Developments in next generation sequencing (NGS) have revolutionized oncogenic biomarker detection, removing the limitations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to allow for massive parallel sequencing to detect multiple oncogenic gene fusions. We believe NGS testing platforms are not uniform within the current solid tumor lab landscape, with NGS analysis capabilities ranging from SNPs only to SNPs and known gene fusions, potentially missing crucial biomarkers. The objective of this study was to determine the current NGS capability of solid tumor labs to detect unknown fusions.
Methods
This study used real-world clinical pathology solid tumor labs data from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany that conduct NGS. The Diaceutics proprietary global database of more than 2500 labs was analysed across these markets in Q4 2018 to understand NGS testing capabilities currently available within the routine clinical lab setting.
Results
The results of the study are presented in the table. Of the 131 labs in the US performing NGS, only 50 were able to detect fusions. Of those 50 labs, 42 were restricted to using panels designed to detect specific known fusions. Only 8 labs in the US were able to detect unknown fusions. This pattern was reflected in labs surveyed in 5 other countries.Table: 1409P
Solid tumor labs: NGS panel use and gene fusion detection
Country | Number of solid tumor labs performing NGS | Number of labs that can detect fusions | Number of labs that can detect known fusions | Number of labs that can detect known and unknown fusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
US | 131 | 50 | 42 | 8 |
France | 39 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
Germany | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Spain | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Italy | 30 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
UK | 24 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
Conclusions
Labs are not well equipped to handle the pace of advancement in biomarker testing. While targeted treatments and companion diagnostics usher in a new age of precision medicine in cancer and extend survival times, many labs lack the technology needed to accurately identify emerging gene fusion biomarkers, especially unknown fusions. This results in both confusion among physicians regarding testing adequacy and missed opportunities for improved outcomes among patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Diaceutics.
Funding
Diaceutics.
Disclosure
S. Finucane: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Haridas: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. L. Handley: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. J. Clark: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Diaceutics. A. Jack: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Munksted: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract