Abstract 4354
Background
Patients’ perception of clinical trials in Poland is mostly influenced by mass media. The image of CTs is often biased which may have an impact on recruitment.
Methods
Based on an anonymous 25-item Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) survey among 191 hospitalized oncological patients we analyzed knowledge, perception, willingness to participate and future expectations of CTs. Nominal scale: Yes/No/Don’t know, Likert scale of 0-5 points and multiple choice questions were applied.
Results
The majority of respondents were: (1) women: 70,2%, (2) people with secondary education: 57,6%, (3) at the age of 60-69: 41,9%, (4) living in cities over 100k inhabitants: 46,1%. Main findings 49,2% of respondents agreed to be enrolled in CTs; 15,3% refused and 35,4% were not certain. Among the driving factors for “YES” were: chance for a better/constant care - 76,3% and access to additional monitoring - 73,1%. 57,0% of respondents declared altruistic reason. The main reasons for not participating were: concern about toxicity - 62,1%, lack of efficacy - 55,2% and being a “guinea pig” - 41,4%. Among respondents uncertain about participation in CT, the factors of the highest impact on potential enrollment were: terminal phase of the disease/no other option: 68,7%/ 56,7%. The incentive of the family member or friend does not have a significant impact - only 19,4% respondents would follow it. Other findings 55,8%/ 54,7% of respondents do not know about the existence of any legal acts/state institutions that oversee CTs. 60,8% of respondents do not know whether there are independent bioethical committees that approve each CT prior to launch. 64,9% of respondents think that research funded by pharma companies is NOT as reliable as that of independent sources eg. medical universities. 76,2% of respondents think that the current amount of information on CTs is insufficient and 87,2% would like to know more.
Conclusions
The level of knowledge about CTs among patients is insufficient but the willingness to participate is high which is mainly driven by a possibility of a better and constant care. The trust in the pharmaceutical industry should be increased.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Kotowski: Full / Part-time employment: Roche Polska sp z o.o. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4596 - A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Encorafenib + Binimetinib Evaluating a Standard-dose and a High-dose Regimen in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastasis (MBM) (POLARIS)
Presenter: Michael Davies
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1891 - Continuation of annual screening mammograms and breast-cancer mortality in women over 70
Presenter: Xabier Garcia De Albeniz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5587 - Introducing standardized medical procedure and dynamic decision support program in precision oncology for the community of practice
Presenter: Istvan Petak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4757 - Effectively using primary care givers in oncology care through capacity building, task sharing and techno-mentoring.
Presenter: Dinesh Pendharkar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4497 - A single institution review of capecitabine related acute admissions and cost analysis
Presenter: Gemma Dart
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2187 - Health status of middle-aged and older cancer survivors in China: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
Presenter: Jiarui Li
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5101 - Crossed looks on lung cancer perception and knowledge from general public and physicians in France: results of a two-fold survey
Presenter: Céline Mascaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3499 - Achieving best possible cancer treatment outcomes in care pathways through benchmarking; ABC-Benchmarking
Presenter: Anke Wind
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2270 - Impact of 10-day Fulbright Specialist Program (FSP) and Project Pink Blue (PPB) Education Sessions on Medical Oncology knowledge among Doctors that treat cancer in Nigeria
Presenter: Mike Martin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract