Abstract 4354
Background
Patients’ perception of clinical trials in Poland is mostly influenced by mass media. The image of CTs is often biased which may have an impact on recruitment.
Methods
Based on an anonymous 25-item Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) survey among 191 hospitalized oncological patients we analyzed knowledge, perception, willingness to participate and future expectations of CTs. Nominal scale: Yes/No/Don’t know, Likert scale of 0-5 points and multiple choice questions were applied.
Results
The majority of respondents were: (1) women: 70,2%, (2) people with secondary education: 57,6%, (3) at the age of 60-69: 41,9%, (4) living in cities over 100k inhabitants: 46,1%. Main findings 49,2% of respondents agreed to be enrolled in CTs; 15,3% refused and 35,4% were not certain. Among the driving factors for “YES” were: chance for a better/constant care - 76,3% and access to additional monitoring - 73,1%. 57,0% of respondents declared altruistic reason. The main reasons for not participating were: concern about toxicity - 62,1%, lack of efficacy - 55,2% and being a “guinea pig” - 41,4%. Among respondents uncertain about participation in CT, the factors of the highest impact on potential enrollment were: terminal phase of the disease/no other option: 68,7%/ 56,7%. The incentive of the family member or friend does not have a significant impact - only 19,4% respondents would follow it. Other findings 55,8%/ 54,7% of respondents do not know about the existence of any legal acts/state institutions that oversee CTs. 60,8% of respondents do not know whether there are independent bioethical committees that approve each CT prior to launch. 64,9% of respondents think that research funded by pharma companies is NOT as reliable as that of independent sources eg. medical universities. 76,2% of respondents think that the current amount of information on CTs is insufficient and 87,2% would like to know more.
Conclusions
The level of knowledge about CTs among patients is insufficient but the willingness to participate is high which is mainly driven by a possibility of a better and constant care. The trust in the pharmaceutical industry should be increased.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Kotowski: Full / Part-time employment: Roche Polska sp z o.o. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3628 - Predictive model for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with frontline pembrolizumab
Presenter: Xabier Mielgo Rubio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5705 - External validation and longitudinal extension of the LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) for immunotherapy outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Presenter: Jakob Riedl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5758 - Changes of TCR Repertoire in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Nivolumab
Presenter: Martin Klabusay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1743 - Expression of MHC class I, HLA-A and HLA-B identifies immune activated breast tumors with favorable outcome
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas López
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2219 - Prognostic Significance of Tumor Tissue NeuGcGM3 Ganglioside Expression and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cell Count Monitoring in Patients Receiving Racotumomab Immunotherapy
Presenter: Necdet Üskent
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2996 - Evolution of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Objective Response Rate in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) patients after receiving immunotherapy
Presenter: Carlos Jiménez Cortegana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2110 - A Phase Ia/Ib trial of the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) human monoclonal antibody (mAb), CS1001, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas
Presenter: Lin Shen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3515 - Results from a randomised Phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety and antitumour activity of anti-PD-1 (MEDI0680)/anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) vs anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) alone in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: Martin Voss
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3566 - Pembrolizumab in Advanced Rare Cancers
Presenter: Aung Naing
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3567 - High clinical benefit rates of pembrolizumab in very rare sarcoma histotypes: first results of the AcSé Pembrolizumab study
Presenter: Jean-Yves Blay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract