Abstract 2241
Background
Treatment options for patients (pts) with mCRPC are noncurative, and life expectancy is only about 3 y. Enzalutamide plus the programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembro showed activity in abiraterone-pretreated pts with mCRPC in the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) study. In another study (NCT02312557) some pts had profound anticancer response to pembro plus enzalutamide that lasted years. KEYNOTE-641 (NCT03834493) is a randomized phase 3 trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of pembro plus enzalutamide vs placebo plus enzalutamide for pts with mCRPC.
Trial design
Adults (≥18 y) with histologically or cytologically confirmed prostate cancer and mCRPC with biochemical or radiographic progression are eligible. Pts who received chemotherapy for mCRPC, checkpoint inhibition, or any treatment with a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor (eg, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide) are excluded. Pts intolerant to or progressed on prior abiraterone therapy were included. Pts must have ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function, and tissue for biomarker analysis. Approximately 1200 pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive enzalutamide 160 mg/d plus pembro 200 mg Q3W or enzalutamide 160 mg/d plus placebo. Treatment will be stratified per prior abiraterone treatment (yes/no), metastases (bone only/liver/other), and prior docetaxel treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (yes/no). Responses will be assessed by CT/MRI and radionuclide bone imaging per PCWG-modified RECIST v1.1 every 9 wk during the first year and every 12 wk thereafter. Treatment will continue with enzalutamide plus pembro/placebo until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal, with a maximum of 2 yr of treatment for the pembro/placebo component of the combination. Primary end points: overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. Key secondary efficacy end point is time to subsequent anticancer therapy or death; safety and tolerability will also be reported.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03834493; February 8, 2019.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Matthew Grzywacz, PhD, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Astellas is providing enzalutamide for this study.
Disclosure
J.N. Graff: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: CME activity for i3 Health; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. J. Burgents: Full / Part-time employment: Merck; Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca; Full / Part-time employment: Array BioPharma; Full / Part-time employment: Merrimack. L.W. Liang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: MSD. A. Stenzl: Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen Pharma, Sanofi Aventis, CureVac, Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Johnson&Johnson, Roche, Cepheid, Amgen Inc, Bayer AG, CureVac, Immatics Biotechnology GmbH, GemeDX Biosciences, Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Novartis AG, Karl Storz AG; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: GBA; Non-remunerated activity/ies, Patents, but no royalties: No company.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract