Abstract 3053
Background
Combination treatment of FTD/TPI plus BEV in the C-TASK FORCE showed a promising activity in pts with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies; however, due to the small sample size, it remains unclear if this combination works in the same way; RAS wild-type or mutant. We investigated the efficacy and safety of this combination in separate cohorts of RAS wild-type and mutant.
Methods
mCRC pts refractory or intolerant to prior treatments with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, an angiogenesis inhibitor, and an anti-EGFR antibody if RAS wild-type, and without FTD/TPI and regorafenib. Pts received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12) and BEV (5mg/kg, day1 and 15) every four weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). A threshold and expected value of the DCR in each wild-type and mutant were set as 44% and 65%, respectively. Assuming a one-sided significance level of 5.0%, each target sample size was estimated to be 49 to achieve a power of 90%.
Results
From Jan to Sep 2018, 102 pts were enrolled, and 98 pts fulfilled the eligibility (49 pts in each). Baseline characteristics of RAS wild-type vs. mutant were follows; median age, 65 vs. 64 years: male, 51% vs. 59%: ECOG PS 0, 69% vs. 59%: left-sided primary, 84% vs. 67%: number of metastasis of > 2, 71% vs. 74%: median time from diagnosis of metastasis, 32.9 vs 21.2 months. The DCR in RAS wild-type was 65.3% (90% CI: 52.6-76.5%, p = 0.0022), while that in RAS mutant was 55.1% (90% CI: 42.4-67.3%, p = 0.0780). There was not a statistically significant difference in DCR between RAS wild-type and mutant after adjustment of baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio=0.48, 90% CI: 0.21-1.10, p = 0.1435). Partial response was observed only in three pts with RAS wild-type. There were neither unexpected safety signals nor treatment related death.
Conclusions
FTD/TPI plus BEV showed a promising activity with an acceptable safety profile for previously treated mCRC harboring either RAS wild-type or mutant. Survival outcome will be presented at the meeting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Japanese Fondation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (JFMC).
Funding
Japanese Fondation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (JFMC).
Disclosure
M. Nakamura: Honoraria (self): Taiho Yakuhin; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Chugai Seiyaku; Honoraria (self): Merck. A. Makiyama: Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lily Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lily Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda Pharm. K. Oba: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharm; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharm; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharm; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Tsumura Pharm. T. Yoshino: Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Daiichi Sankyo Company; Research grant / Funding (self): Parexel; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono Pharmaceutical. K. Yoshida: Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono Pharma; Honoraria (self): EA Pharma; Honoraria (self): Johnson & Johnson; Honoraria (self): SBI Pharma; Honoraria (self): Olympus; Honoraria (self): Covidien; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): TERUMO; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Tsumura; Honoraria (self): Asahi Kasei; Honoraria (self): Pharma International Osaka; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha. K. Yamazaki: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai. E. Oki: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm. T. Takahashi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract