Abstract 4679
Background
Cachexia affects 70-80% patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). Systemic inflammation is a key feature of this multifactorial syndrome of unintended weight loss (WL). Despite being often described, cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) remains poorly understood and rarely recognized in clinical settings, therefore an unmet need. This study aims to acknowledge the effect of CAC in PA patients and to study the impact of WL, body mass index (BMI) and other available biomarkers (BM) on survival.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of PA patients treated in our institution between 2013 - 2018. Patients were categorized at baseline as having CAC if 1 of 2 criteria were met: WL > 5% from previous stable weight; BMI < 20 kg/ m2 and ongoing WL > 2%. Serum hemoglobin, c-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, inflammation-based score (Glasgow Prognostic Score mGPS), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and cancer specific antigen CA 19-9 were assessed at baseline and at 3-month. Data analysis with descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-square test, cox regression and log-rank test were performed with StataIC.
Results
95 eligible patients (median age 72 [46;98], 60% female) were reviewed. At baseline, cachectic patients (CP) (74%), when compared to non-CP, had higher CA 19-9 (p = 0,047), more advanced disease (p = 0,001) lower BMI (p = 0,016), worse performance status (p = 0,016) and mean WL of 13,8 ± 6,7 (%) (p = 0,001). Also, NLR>3,5 (p = 0,001), PLR>150 (p = 0,018) and hypoalbuminemia (p = 0,004) were all statistically associated to CP. Median overall survival (OS) of non-CP was 19,13 months versus 5,03 months in CP (HR 2,69 95% CI 1,58-4,59, p = 0,001). In the latter, at baseline, higher CA 19.9 (HR 1,0 95% CI 1,01-1,021, p = 0,015), higher CRP (HR 1,21 95% CI 1,06-1,39, p = 0,006) and PLR>150 (HR 2,45; 95% CI 1,09-5,54, p = 0,031) were independent predictors of worst OS. In non-CP, normal baseline albumin (HR 0,04 95 CI 0,02-0,72, p = 0,029) was an independent predictor of better OS.
Conclusions
A better understanding of CAC in PA might improve outcomes for PA patients. Our study suggests that a prompt identification of prognostic BM may lead to a better standardized management of CAC and that nutritional parameters can be optimized, with impact on prognosis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract