Abstract 1946
Background
Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy at presentation is important to demonstrate the phase of the disease, to provide material for cytogenetic studies and to demonstrate the myelofibrosis, which have prognostic and therapeutic implications. In the current era of molecular diagnostics, the role of bone marrow examination is questionable. The present study was designed to identify the role of bone marrow examination on phase migration, karyotyping and myelofibrosis.
Methods
Data of newly diagnosed CML patients seen between January 2013 and June 2018 was retrospectively analysed. CML was confirmed by demonstration of BCR-ABL fusion gene by PCR or FISH. Patients were stratified into chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) according to WHO diagnostic criteria (2016).
Results
Of 749 patients, 541 patients had evaluable data. The male female ratio was 1.52:1 The median age at presentation was 37 years (range, 9-80 years). According to EUTOS risk stratification, 406 (75.1%) patients were low risk and 135(24.9%) were high risk. Based on bone marrow blasts criterion, phase migration occurred in 16 (2.9%). Of these 16 patients, phase migration from CP to AP, CP to BP and AP to BP were seen in 8 (50%), 4(25%) and 4 (25%) patients, respectively. Data on karyotyping was available in 195 (36%) patients. Of 195 patients, additional cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 30 (15.3%) which includes, major route abnormalities in 11 (5.6%) patients. Of these 11 patients, 6 patients were in CP, 4 patients were in AP and 1 patient in BP. Myelofibrosis was demonstrated in 264 (48.7%) patients of which grade 1, grade 2, grade 3 and grade 4 were seen in 72 (13.3%), 100 (18.5%), 70 (12.9%); 20 (3.7%) patients respectively.
Conclusions
Bone marrow examination at presentation in CML patients results in phase migration, provides adequate material for cytogenetic studies and demonstrates presence of myelofibrosis. Hence, bone marrow examination is indispensable in newly diagnosed CML patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract