Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1058 - Assessment of CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore and modified Neo-Bioscore in breast cancer patients treated with preoperative systemic therapy: a multicenter cohort study
Presenter: LING XU
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1156 - The concordance of treatment decision guided by Oncotype and the PREDICT tool in early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Hadar Goldvaser
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3447 - Influence of first treatment delay on survival among breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Irene Zarcos Pedrinaci
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3505 - Clinical features of early-stage (I-III) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with tumors exhibiting low-overall change in molecular profile after neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Nour Abuhadra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5442 - Meta-analysis in HER2+ early breast cancer therapies and cost-effectiveness in a Brazilian perspective
Presenter: Marcos Magalhaes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1570 - Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle counts (AFC) may predict ovarian reserves before systemic chemotherapy (SC) in women with breast cancer(BC); a prospective clinical study
Presenter: Cetin Ordu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2698 - Prognosis of selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
Presenter: Giuseppe Cancello
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3104 - Novel Blood Based Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarker For Breast Cancer Detection
Presenter: Chun-Yu Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4631 - Multi-Gene Prognostic Signatures and Prediction of Pathological Complete Response of ER-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients to Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Presenter: Claudia Mazo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4632 - Impact of menopause status on breast cancer outcomes and amenorrhea incidence during adjuvant tailored dose dense chemotherapy
Presenter: Andri Papakonstantinou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract