Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4317 - Prognostic factors analysis of 343 patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Yixun Lu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4099 - Effects of preoperative preparation time on efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Xinxin Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3769 - The prognostic value of higher absolute lymphocyte counts for patients with surgically resected non-advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1718 - Trastuzumab and pertuzumab added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable HER2+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients: an update on survival and predictive biomarkers in the TRAP study
Presenter: Charlotte Stroes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5403 - Interim analysis of a phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy plus avelumab in esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Thierry Alcindor
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
591 - Evaluation of the introduction of primary G-CSF prophylaxis to the FLOT chemotherapy regimen.
Presenter: Kelly-Marie Crampton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1402 - Subgroup analyses of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 2 and 4 courses of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Tsutomu Hayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3743 - HER2 Copy Number as Predictor of Disease-Free Survival in HER2-Positive Resectable Gastric Cancer
Presenter: Zimin Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2032 - Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the Programmed Death-1 pathway in esophageal and gastric cancer
Presenter: Maria Svensson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4304 - A user-friendly nomogram to predict relapse-free survival (RFS) in western patients with resected gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Massimiliano Salati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract