Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3875 - Correlation of radiotherapy with the prognosis of elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer according to immunohistochemical subtyping
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5793 - Real world treatment sequencing patterns in secondary breast cancer (SBC): Pathway visualisation using national datasets.
Presenter: Ashley Horne
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3185 - Utilization Pattern of Bone Targeting Agents in Patients with Solid Tumor in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Korea
Presenter: Shi Jie Lai
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3705 - Clinico-pathological Features and Prognosis of Patients with Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer – A Matched Case Control Study
Presenter: Ruyan Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1421 - TRYbeCA-2: A Randomized Phase 2/3 Study of Eryaspase in Combination with Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Presenter: Ahmad Awada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4119 - CONTESSA TRIO: A Multinational, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Tesetaxel plus 3 Different PD-(L)1 Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and Tesetaxel Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
Presenter: Sara Tolaney
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4545 - Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) and Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)(NCT03579472)
Presenter: Jennifer Litton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3340 - Effectiveness of Olaparib Plus Trastuzumab in HER2[+], BRCA–mutated (BRCAm) or Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) patients (pts). The OPHELIA Study
Presenter: José Enrique Alés-Martínez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1113 - RIBOB : A Study on the efficacy and safety of Ribociclib in combination with letrozole in Older women (≥70 years) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced Breast cancer (aBC) with no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease
Presenter: Cindy Kenis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4025 - RIbociclib plus Goserelin with Hormonal Therapy versus physician Choice chemotherapy in premenopausal or perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer – RIGHT Choice study
Presenter: Nagi El Saghir
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract