Abstract 3120
Background
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care. Despite major improvements in survival, many patients do not derive long-term benefit and treatment could cause severe side-effects. Since several new (combination) therapies are or will become available, early prediction of non-responsiveness (NR) to anti-PD-1 monotherapy becomes relevant in order to enable early switch to next line (combination) treatment and avoid nonsensical care.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab (PEM) who started PEM between June 2014 and August 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. S100 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were routinely determined prior to initiation of PEM and every 3-weeks during treatment. NR to treatment was defined as progressive disease or death at 6 months after start of PEM. Biomarker response characteristic (BReC) plots were obtained and LDH and S100 response cut-offs were determined based on two criteria: specificity for NR > 95% and feasibility to use in clinical practice. Next, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were generated per follow-up time point (week 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15).
Results
166 advanced melanoma patients were included. The BReC analyses showed clear relations between an early (week 3 to 15) increase in tumor biomarker and NR. An increase of > 50% in LDH or a > 100% increase in S100 above the upper limit of normal compared to baseline at any follow-up interval was determined as criterion to positively test for NR. Obtained specificity ranged from 0.97-0.98 and the positive predictive value ranged from 0.92-0.96 for the studied follow-up intervals. Obtained sensitivity for detecting non-responsiveness ranged from 0.25 (95% CI; 0.16-0.35) at 3 weeks of follow-up to 0.35 (95% CI; 0.24-0.47) at 12 weeks of follow-up.
Conclusions
An early increase in S100 and/or LDH are strong parameters for non-responsiveness to PD-1 blockade in advanced melanoma. Prospective confirmation is needed before clinical implementation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD. J.V. van Thienen: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. J.B.A.G. Haanen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ/MedImmune; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Neon Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Celsius; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Gadet. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly ; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2262 - Real world experience of Nivolumab therapy in Metastatic Renal Cancer patients: a 3 year multi-centre review
Presenter: Joanna Hack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4441 - “A pilot study of tremelimumab (treme) with or without cryoablation (cryo) in patients (pts) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).”
Presenter: Matthew Campbell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2613 - Lenvatinib (Len) alone or in combination with Everolimus (Eve) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and VEGFR-targeted therapies: A single-institution experience
Presenter: Andrew Wiele
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3249 - Weight loss is an underestimated adverse event with cabozantinib in patients with metastastic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Presenter: Emeline Colomba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2405 - Impact of corticosteroids on nivolumab activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Presenter: Felix Lefort
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4020 - Skeletal muscle loss as an adverse event during Cabozantinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Carolina Alves Costa Silva
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2407 - Long term relative survival (RS) in patients with primary metastatic kidney cancer (primary mRCC): an analysis of 2,167 patients from the Austrian National Cancer Registry (ANCR).
Presenter: Monika Hackl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2470 - Advanced renal cell carcinoma: first results from the prospective research platform CARAT for patients with mRCC in Germany
Presenter: Peter Goebell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1533 - Are immune checkpoint inhibitors a valid option for papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma? Transcriptomic characterization of the immune infiltrate
Presenter: Manon De Vries-brilland
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract