Abstract 2504
Background
The most largely used definition (and staging system) of Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (ONJ), more recently named Medication-Releated ONJ (MRONJ), was released by an American Association Oral Maxillofacial Surgery (AAOMS) task force. It is based on clinical features (mainly bone exposure for at least 8 weeks, or – only after 2014 - bone to be probed through a fistula) but the AAOMS is questioned by many experts. A team supported by the Italian Societies of Oral Medicine (SIPMO) and Maxillofacial Surgery (SICMF) suggested adoption of imaging tools (mainly Computed Tomography, CT) together with clinical features (Bedogni et al, Oral Disease 2012) to reach diagnosis (also in suspected cases without bone exposure, so called “Stage 0” according to AAOMS) and to evaluate real disease extension.
Methods
To compare the stage of MRONJ cases at the first observation time in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab), according to two different staging systems, we reviewed charts and CT scans of cancer and myeloma patients with signs of ONJ.
Results
We collected data of 151 MRONJ patients in two referral centers. Disease: 73 breast cancer; 28 myeloma; 26 prostate cancer; 24 other solid tumors. The AAOMS stage was 0/I/II/III respectively in 34/38/52/27 observed cases. The SIPMO-SICMF stage was I (involvement of only alveolar bone at CT scan)/ II (extended to extralveolar bone) /III (complicated case) respectively in 48/76/27 cases. The 34 AAOMS “stage 0” cases (signs/symptoms without bone exposure) were reclassified as stage I (14) or II (20) or III (0) respectively, according to the Italian staging system.
Conclusions
In cancer and myeloma patients the AAOMS definition and staging system appear inadequate, potentially exposing patients to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis and staging should be based not only on clinical data but also on the findings of the maxillofacial region CT scan, since the CT offers larger information about extent and severity of the disease.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract