Abstract 5989
Background
Following the rapid expansion in the use of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) there has been increasing concern regarding the immune related adverse everts (irAE) associated with their usage. Whilst the efficacy is unquestionable the demand the management of patients receiving ICIs is having on oncological services is increasing and challenging in its differences to more traditional systemic anticancer therapies.
Methods
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre established an Immuno-oncology (IO) committee early in the usage of ICIs having recognised the need to have a dedicated service for the support and management of patients receiving ICIs. This included the establishment of a toxicity management service delivered a dedicated nursing team with clinician oversight alongside the development of standard operating procedures, supporting documentation, patient and educational resources.
Results
The service was implemented with the appointment of a lead immunotherapy nurse in August 2018 and a clinical nurse specialist in October 2018. These two nurses deliver the IO toxicity service with clinical support from two medical oncology consultants and a clinical fellow. Prior to the introduction of the service, between 2016-2018, there had been 8 fold increase in the admissions due to IO. Following the introduction of the service IO admission rates have fallen by 40% over the 7 month period the service has been in place compared to the preceding 7 month period (72 vs 120 admissions). Triage calls have fallen by 16.6% and face to face reviews reduced by 9.6%. This is despite a 20% (290 vs 240 patients) increase in the number of patients commencing on ICIs in the same periods. Development of toxicity team irAE outpatient management pathways for IV therapies and a immunosuppression monitoring service have also been established.
Conclusions
A dedicated immunotherapy toxicity service has reduced the acute admissions related to irAE and is starting to reduce the activity of oncology outpatient services despite ongoing increases in ICI indications, number of administrations and complexity of combination therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This study was completed in part by a clinical research fellow (ACOB) who is currently funded by a Medical Research Council fellowship part funded by a UCB pharma, Roche, Eli Lilly and Novartis collaborative.
Disclosure
A.C. Olsson-Brown: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): MSD ; Research grant / Funding (self): UCB Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly. T. Guinan: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Chow: Honoraria (self): Novartis. R. Lord: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. J.J. Sacco: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: immunocore. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract