Abstract 1540
Background
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive, cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is detected in the majority of MCCs while MCPyV-negative cases are thought to arise through progressive accumulation of ultraviolet-light induced somatic mutations. In a non-selected cohort of stage IV MCC patients, treatment with Avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody), showed durable responses in less than a third of patients, regardless of their PD-L1 or MCV status. We hypothesized that there are significant differences in other predictors of response to I-O therapy in MCC related to their oncogenic origins.
Methods
48 MCC samples were analyzed for the presence of MCPyV using immunohistochemistry for detection of the large T-antigen (CM2B4 clone). Biomarkers of I-O therapy response included: expression of PD-L1 (IHC), total mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI).
Results
Overall, MCPyV was detected in 18/48 cases using IHC (37.5%). In MCPyV-positive cases (N = 9) average TMB was 6/Mb (range 4-11/Mb), while MCPyV-negative cases (N = 21) had a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher average TMB of 25/Mb (range 4-68/Mb). No microsatellite instability was detected in any of the cases (0/22). The most commonly mutated gene in MCPyV-negative cohort was TP53 detected in 20 cases, with co-mutation of RB1 in 11 cases. Only one pathogenic mutation (ARID1A) was detected in any of the 9 MCPyV-positive cases. A single (MCPyV-positive) case exhibited PD-L1 expression in 5% of tumor cells.
Conclusions
MCPyV associated MCC was present in a significantly lower proportion of cases in our data set (37.5%) than has been reported in the general population (70-80%), potentially due to preselection of advanced disease cases. Successes of Avelumab therapy in MCC may be related to the high mutational load in MCPyV-negative cases and mediated through PD-L1+ immune cell infiltrate (IC) influence on effector (PD-1) lymphocytes, or some other mechanism. Further analysis of the status of these (and potentially other) biomarkers of response to immune check point inhibitors is recommended to refine the subgroups of patients responding to therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Caris Life Sciences.
Funding
Caris Life Sciences.
Disclosure
Z. Gatalica: Leadership role: Caris Life Sciences. J. Xiu: Leadership role, employment: Caris Life Sciences. J. Swensen: Leadership role, employment: Caris Life Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract