Abstract 5783
Background
Six anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents have been FDA approved for various cancers. Despite a lack of head-to-head trials, there is a perception that the irAE profiles are comparable between agents. We hypothesized that the irAE profiles vary between anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 agents and among individual agents. Since prospective comparison is unlikely, we conducted a trial-level meta-analysis of irAEs reported in phase I–IV trials evaluating anti–PD-1/L1 agents in various tumor types.
Methods
We analyzed data from 35 manuscripts reporting phase I (n = 18), 2 (n = 15), 3 (n = 9) or 4 (n = 1) trials, comprising 8,730 patients treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The incidence and odds ratios (ORs) for selected clinically relevant irAEs (colitis, elevated AST, hypothyroidism, pneumonitis or rash; any grade and grade ≥3) and irAEs overall were estimated using random-effects models for anti–PD-L1 agents atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab; for anti–PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab; and as pooled estimates for anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 agents.
Results
The risk of any grade (OR = 4.34) and grade ≥3 rash (OR = 4.38); grade ≥3 hypothyroidism (OR = 2.85); any grade (OR = 2.53) and grade ≥3 colitis (OR = 3.79); and any grade ≥3 irAE (OR = 1.89) was higher with anti–PD-1 vs anti–PD-L1 agents. When comparing the risk of all selected irAEs for each agent with pooled estimates for all other agents combined, atezolizumab had the lowest risk, followed by avelumab; pembrolizumab had a higher risk, except for grade ≥3 elevated AST. In pairwise comparisons, the risks associated with atezolizumab vs avelumab were not significantly different, likewise for nivolumab vs pembrolizumab. The largest decrease in risk for all grade ≥3 irAEs except elevated AST was for avelumab vs pembrolizumab.
Conclusions
Overall, the risk of grade ≥3 irAEs was higher with anti–PD-1 vs anti–PD-L1 agents. Compared with other agents, avelumab had a lower risk of individual grade ≥3 irAEs except elevated AST, whereas atezolizumab had the lowest risk of irAEs of any grade. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the meta-analysis and varied tumor types, trial designs, treatment durations and irAE evaluations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
ClinicalThinking, funded by Merck Healthcare KGaA and Pfizer Inc.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Funding
Merck Healthcare KGaA and Pfizer Inc.
Disclosure
G.P. Sonpavde: Honoraria (self): UpToDate; Advisory / Consultancy: Agensys; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck & Co.; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Clinical Care Options/NCCN; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Onclive; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Physician Education Resource; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Research to Practice; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Onyx; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. P. Grivas: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Biocept; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Clovis Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Driver, Inc; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Foundation Medicine; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck & Co.; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: QED Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Mirati Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncogenex. D. Hennessy: Full / Part-time employment: EMD Serono. J.D. Hunt: Full / Part-time employment: EMD Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract