Abstract 1679
Background
Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) elicits cervical cancers and provides an ideal target for T cell-based immunotherapy. Although engineered T cell therapies delivered unprecedented successes in hematological cancers, treating solid cancers has been suboptimal. One key mechanism of tumor-elicited suppression is the PDL1-PD1 checkpoint which blocks T cell activation. Therefore, TCR-T cells armored with checkpoint blockades may further enhance the efficacy of TCR-T in solid cancers.
Methods
HPV16+HLA-A2+ Stage IV cervical cancer patients were consented and enrolled to a two-arm study: Arm 1 is a mono-treatment with HPV16 TCR-T, and, Arm 2 is a treatment with anti-PD1 scFv expressing HPV16 TCR-T cells. PBMCs were collected from patient by lymphocyte apheresis and a TCR targeting HLA-A2-presented E6 epitope was retrovirally transduced. This study is designed for dose escalation at three levels: 5 × 106/kg, 1 × 107/kg, and 5 × 107/kg. Initial safety and efficacy were monitored at day 7, 14, 28 post treatment, followed by long-term monthly monitoring for up to two years.
Results
By the date of submission, five patients have been treated in Arm 1: two were infused with 5 × 106/kg dose, and three were infused with 1 × 107/kg dose. Adverse effects include leukocytopenia (100%), anemia (100%), fatigue (60%), fever (40%) and thrombocytopenia (40%). One patient (20%) had Grade 4 leukocytopenia. No CRS was observed. For all five patients, TCR-T cells were engrafted, and expanded with peak responses during day 7 to 14 post-infusion. At 28 days post-infusion, three patients (60%) were assessed as SD, one patient (20%) was assessed as PD, and one patient was absent for follow-up. Two patients have been recruited for arm 2. One patient received 5 × 106/kg and one received 1 × 107/kg of anti-PD1 armored TCR-T cells. The low dose patient was assessed as SD at both day 28 and month 2 post treatment.
Conclusions
With mild and manageable sides effects, both mono and anti-PD1-armored E6-TCR-T therapies demonstrated to be safe at up to 1 × 107/kg dosage. T cells were stimulated in patients and clinical responses can be identified. These results warrant further evaluation of the safety and efficacy at higher doses.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03578406.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Xinqiao Hospital, Third Militrary Medical University and TCRCure Biopharma Corp.
Funding
TCRCure Biopharma Corp.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract