Abstract 1925
Background
Limited researches evaluate effectiveness of cancer patients-centered home care management. In this context, patients’ needs rather than prognosis should be considered. Our project represents an opportunity for patients who may benefit from chemotherapy, but with physical and social problems that prevent day-hospital access, and a model of no profit contribution to the Public Health System.
Methods
Our Medical Oncology Department, supported by a no-profit organization and according to the GP, conducted the project from May 2014 to March 2019. We included frail patients selected with G8 score (<14), with advanced disease, treated with oral, subcutaneously or parenteral biological agents, with limitations to day-hospital access, comorbidities and at least six months life expectancy. A multidisciplinary team, coordinated by three oncologists, included also four nurses, a pain therapist, a psychologist and a physiotherapist. Satisfaction was evaluated with the FAMCARE scale.
Results
A total of 161 patients (median age of 71 years, range 38-93), were enrolled. Ninety percent of patients had metastatic disease and median G8 score of 8.8 (2.5-13.5). All of them received home cancer treatments and concomitant supportive cares, if necessary; 24 patients received two or more lines of cancer treatment. Considering 148 concluded taking care, median time was 175 days (7-1200). A median number of 254 (195-325) nursing home visits and 164 (139-190) medical home visits were performed each year, with an average of 1.6 and 1.1 visits per month per patient, respectively. Median number of in-line patients was 20 (17-25). Hospitalization occurred in 19.3%. Home blood transfusions were delivered in 6 patients, paracentesis in 8. One third of them died at home. FAMECARE assessed high satisfaction.
Conclusions
Our experience demonstrates that the integration of home cancer treatment and supportive care is feasible and effective. Hospitalization rate is lower than data reported in literature. If confirmed in perspective pharmaco-economics studies, our data suggest that home cancer treatments provide high quality assistance to frail patients. Integration with no-profit organization was successful. Our model could be applied in other settings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4139 - Patient (pt) selection for immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single Phase I Unit experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract