Abstract 2452
Background
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been known to be released from tumor cells and evaluated as potential biomarkers for therapeutic responses. In our previous study, we proved applicability for KRAS mutation as a prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) through the quantitative analysis of ctDNA using KRAS multiplex kit which covers 7 sites. In this study, we analyzed distribution of each single mutation in tumor and ctDNA by performed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).
Methods
Total of 126 PDA patients were enrolled and analyzed for tumor DNA. We found 94 patients have samples for matched ctDNA analysis. Plasma was separated by established method and ctDNA were extracted using QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit. QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System was applied to measure frequency of KRAS mutations using KRAS screening multiplex kit and probe for G12D, G12V and G12C in ctDNA and tumor DNA. Then, we compared the frequency between multiplex and single point mutation of KRAS.
Results
The positivity of mutation of tumor and ctDNA in multiplex ddPCR were 96.0% (n = 121/126) and 60.3% (n = 76/126), respectively. Positive rates of G12D, G12V and G12C were 59.6%, 24.5% and 22.3% in tumor and 36.2%, 16.0% and 17.0% in ctDNA, respectively. There was a correlation between multiplex and the sum of single point mutation (r = 0.805). In the single point mutation results, 44 of the samples detected in both tumor and ctDNA mutations were detected in the same site (75.9%), 12 of them were partially identical (19.0%), and 3 were inconsistent (5.2%). Comparing the frequency with other studies, G12D and G12V showed no difference in frequency, but G12C showed a higher positive rate than the previous studies even though we did not analysis for G12R. Multiple KRAS mutations were found in 17% and 6.4% in tumor and ctDNA.
Conclusions
These results show that the frequency of KRAS mutation correlated with tumor tissue and ctDNA. Also multiple mutations were detected high proportion compared to the previous studies. Further studies are needed to determine G12R proportion. We further evaluate whether the single point mutation detected by single probe is more valuable than sum of mutations from KRAS multiplex kit as a biomarker for predicting the prognosis of PDA.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun-Young Kong.
Funding
National Cancer Center and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract