Abstract 3426
Background
Subgroup analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using high dose chemotherapy (HD) with autologous stem cell support (autoSCT) reveal a potential benefit of HD in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and in tumors harboring features of HRD (Vollebergh et al, 2011). The phase III part of the neo-TN RCT, compared neo-adjuvant HD with conventional treatment (CONV) in BRCA1-like TNBC.
Methods
Patients with cT2-3N0-3M0 TNBC with HRD were randomized between HD or CONV after 3 courses of 2-weekly doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (ddA60C600). CONV treatment consisted of another 3xddAC, or in case of an unfavorable response on MRI a switch to 3 cycles capecitabine800BID14-7/docetaxel75; after an amendment all patients switched to 3xcarboplatinAUC6/paclitaxel80weekly. The HD regimen consisted of a 4th course ddAC and 2 courses of cyclophosphamide3000d1/carboplatin400d1,2/ thiotepa250d2 both followed by autoSCT. Primary outcome was the Neo-adjuvant Response Index (NRI), secondary outcomes included overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS).
Results
From 2010 to 2016, 122 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat). Median follow-up is 45 months. There was no significant difference in NRI between HD and CONV (mean NRI 0.78 versus 0.72, range 0-1, p = 0.41 Wilcoxon test). An NRI of > 0.7 was strongly associated with good prognosis (RFS of 97% [95%CI 93%-100%] versus 67% [95%CI 55%-82%] at 4 years). See Table for 4-years OS and RFS comparing HD with CONV. There were no treatment related deaths. However, 7 out of 55 patients who actually received HD did not complete HD mainly because of infections or allergic reactions.Table:
187P
HD % (95%CI) | CONV % (95%CI) | HR (95%CI) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
All (n = 122) | ||||
4-yrs OS 4-yrs RFS | 92 (85-99) 92 (85-99) | 79 (69-91) 78 (68-89) | 0.43 (0.15-1.23) 0.41 (0.15-1.07) | 0.12 0.07 |
Stage III only (n = 35) | ||||
4-yrs OS | 93 (81-100) | 60 (39-93) | 0.14 (0.02-1.14) | 0.07 |
Conclusions
No significant efficacy differences were found between HD and CONV. The NRI is of prognostic value. Whether the HD regimen is promising, especially in very high risk BRCA1-like TNBC [HR = 0.14], requires additional data including a comparison with platinum treatment in all control arm patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01057069.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF) and by the Schumacher Kramer Foundation.
Disclosure
S.C. Linn: Research grant / Funding (self), research support for patients fees in D-Care study: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Cergentis; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: IBM; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), patients fees in TEAM 2b study: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Fee for teaching, paid to institution: Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5812 - Correlation between the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune cell subsets in tumor stroma and response to systemic therapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Cvetka Grasic Kuhar
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4734 - BRCA1/2 Testing in HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Results from the European Component of a Multi-Country Real World Study
Presenter: Michael Patrick Lux
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1686 - In vitro and in vivo rescue of resistance to BET inhibitors by targeting PLK1 in triple negative breast cancer.
Presenter: Cristina Nieto-jiménez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5020 - Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in combination with melatonin and metformin in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Semiglazova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5082 - Melatonin and metformin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Semiglazova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2642 - Patient-tailored tamoxifen dosing based on an increased quantitative understanding of its complex pharmacokinetics: A novel integrative modelling approach
Presenter: Anna Mueller-Schoell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2461 - Lack of benefit of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in high risk HER2 positive breast cancer. A retrospective case-control study of 355 cases with biomarker analysis.
Presenter: Manuela Tiako Meyo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4776 - Targeting CDCA3 to improve chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Kenneth O'Byrne
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1674 - Activity of BET-proteolysis targeting chimeric (PROTAC) compounds in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas López
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5629 - Outcome of triple negative inflammatory breast cancers (TNIBC) treated with dose dense neoadjuvant epirubicin cyclophosphmide, prognostic impact of pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and post NAC lymphovascular invasion
Presenter: Luca Campedel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract