Abstract 3152
Background
In the single-arm, open-label, multicentre, international phase II trial (NCT02155647 Part A), metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients received second-line or later avelumab 10 mg/kg every two weeks. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the skin cancer-specific FACT-M and the generic EQ-5D. We report HRQoL results 36 months after enrolment of the last patient with focus on HRQoL deterioration-free survival (QFS) rates.
Methods
HRQoL data were obtained at baseline, week 7, and every 6 weeks until disease progression and/or treatment discontinuation. QFS was defined as the time interval between first dose and HRQoL deterioration event i.e. when a HRQoL domain score (FACT-M/EQ VAS) decreased from baseline equivalent to the minimal important difference (MID) threshold, with no further improvement thereafter. For sensitivity analyses, two thresholds are applied termed as minimum and maximum MID. QFS rates were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves and could be interpreted as the likelihood of a patient to endure a time period without relevant HRQoL deterioration until a certain time point.
Results
Based on the intention-to-treat population (n = 88), QFS rates ranged from 40.6% (FACT-M functional well-being, FWB) to 56.3% (EQ VAS) at 12 months when applying minimum MIDs (Table). At 36 months, rates ranged from 20.7% (FWB) to 37.7% (FACT-M social well-being). When applying the maximum MID, QFS rates ranged from 48.6% to 64.9% at 12 months, and 25.3% to 42.7% at 36 months.Table:
1320P HRQoL deterioration-free survival rates (QFS) by time interval (12, 24, 36 months) based on EQ VAS and FACT-M scores applying (negative) minimum/maximum Minimal Important Difference (MID) thresholds, ITT population (N = 88)
MID thresholds1 (min./max.) | HRQoL deterioration-free survival rates (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum MID | Maximum MID | ||||||
Month 12 | Month 24 | Month 36 | Month 12 | Month 24 | Month 36 | ||
EQ-5D | |||||||
EQ VAS | -7 / -10 | 56.3 | 47.4 | 34.8 | 59.0 | 45.5 | 38.5 |
FACT-M | |||||||
Physical well-being (PWB) | -1 / -3 | 46.7 | 43.0 | 36.4 | 52.6 | 46.1 | 35.8 |
Social/Family well-being (SWB) | -1/ -3 | 44.0 | 37.7 | 37.7 | 49.5 | 49.5 | 40.5 |
Emotional well-being (EWB) | -1 / -3 | 49.2 | 41.0 | 32.8 | 55.9 | 51.2 | 42.7 |
Functional well-being (FWB) | -2 / -4 | 40.6 | 32.6 | 20.7 | 52.8 | 48.5 | 33.6 |
Melanoma subscale (MS) | -2 / -5 | 49.7 | 45.7 | 37.4 | 64.9 | 49.1 | 38.2 |
Melanoma surgery scale (MSS) | -2 / -3 | 51.4 | 51.4 | 36.7 | 48.6 | 48.6 | 34.7 |
Trial Outcome Index (TOI) | -4 / -9 | 50.4 | 38.2 | 31.2 | 61.2 | 42.1 | 32.7 |
FACT-G Total Score | -4 / -8 | 46.8 | 37.7 | 24.0 | 51.7 | 43.4 | 27.6 |
FACT-M Total Score | -5 / -12 | 46.6 | 37.6 | 23.9 | 56.9 | 39.7 | 25.3 |
Published in Bharmal, et al. (2017). "Psychometric properties of the FACT-M questionnaire in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma." Health Qual Life Outcomes 15(1): 247. Legend: HRQoL=Health-Related Quality of Life; QFS=HRQoL deterioration-free survival rate; MID=Minimal Important Difference; ITT=Intention-to-treat population; VAS=visual analogue scale; EQ VAS=VAS of the EQ-5D questionnaire
Conclusions
As expected, QFS rates decreased over time; however, in the context of an aggressive cancer such as mMCC, various HRQoL domains show promising QFS rates suggesting a substantial proportion of patients reported stable or improved HRQoL on treatment with avelumab across time points, aligned with the clinical efficacy results throughout the long study follow-up of over 36 months.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02155647.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Funding
This study was sponsored by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and is part of an alliance between Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Disclosure
S.P. D’Angelo: Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Nektar; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: ImmuneDesign; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Adaptimmune. S. Nolte: Full / Part-time employment, Employee of ICON plc, which is a paid consultant to the study sponsor: ICON plc. M. Schlichting: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. M. Henry-Szatkowski: Full / Part-time employment, Employee of ICON plc, which is a paid consultant to the study sponsor: ICON plc. M. Hennessy: Full / Part-time employment: EMD Serono, Inc. M. Bharmal: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract