Abstract 3047
Background
Recent studies indicate that quality of life plays crucial role in cancer patients’ outcome. In order to obtain a more comprehensive view into this option, we applied three different questionnaires, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-general (FACT-G) and the generic Short –Form 36 (SF-36) for registering the haematological malignancies patients’ point of view.
Methods
A cross- sectional study was established involving 67 patients, treated in a large hospital in a major Northern Greek city, with haematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy in cycle 3. Data was collected using the three aforementioned scales in addition with a questionnaire with demographic and clinical characteristics.
Results
The vast majority of patients were men (n = 42, 62.7%) and married ( 65.7 %, n = 44). Ten out of sixty-seven were multiple myeloma patients (n = 10, 14.9%). The mean scores of overall scales were: SF-36: 47.93±18.84, FACT-G: 73.68±18.25, EORTC-QLQ: 70,70±17.93. Cronbach’s a was >0.70 for all of the subscales of the questionnaires. There is an exception in emotional well being subscale of FACT-G and in physical functional subscale of EORTC QLQ-C30. Also, there was a strong correlation (>0.50) between physical functional subscale and emotional function subscale of the FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 instruments (p < 0.001) and generally between the overall scores of three questionnaires (r = 0.771, p < 0.001 between FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30; r = 0.771, p < 0.001 between SF-36 and FACT-G; r = 0.842 p < 0.001 between SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-C30).
Conclusions
The Greek versions of FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 questionnaires are valuable tools that could be easily applied in a daily practical routine for assessing quality of life in patients with hematological malignancies. Additionally, the above procedure provides valid information to the nursing staff in order to help their patients to improve their quality of life having possible influence in the disease outcome.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract