Abstract 6042
Background
Leadership is nursing is widely discussed and recognised as an important element in nursing services and indeed in health service development. Nurse leaders are in a prime position to facilitate and drive change within the healthcare setting. Nurse leaders can be role models within the workforce and integral in guiding and motivating teams to meet organisational goals. Whilst it often feels change within the clinical environment, occurs at a rapid rate or too frequently, resulting in a degree of change fatigue amongst nursing colleagues. Organisational change is often in response to advancements in medical knowledge, workforce demands or in this case, infrastructure change in response to increased demand upon a service. The authors work in a busy cancer centre, which delivers day case chemotherapy to approximately 130 patients a day. Delays resulting from patients attending day care in blocks of time resulted in bottle necks, meaning many faced long waits for their chemotherapy. A new scheduling system was implemented to focus booking patients based on chair availability and thus staggered more consistently across the day. The objective of the change was to improve patients’ attendance on our chemotherapy day unit, to prevent lengthy delays and streamline the process of delivering chemotherapy. The focus of this review, is how nursing leadership was instrumental in delivering change and how nurses are optimally positioned to drive change and manage projects in the healthcare setting.
Methods
A project was undertaken to implement a new electronic system for scheduling chemotherapy for a busy chemo day service. The project was led by oncology nurses within the service.
Results
The project outcome to implement a new electronic scheduling system was achieved in a timely manner. The project drivers did encounter some reticence, when colleagues faced new ways of working. Open and constant dialogue was maintained to ensure all stakeholders were fully apprised of the rationale for the change, the timescale and outcomes.
Conclusions
The importance of steady, intelligent leadership from nurses cannot be overestimated. Solidarity amongst nursing colleagues and allied health professionals is essential to optimise organisational efficacy and quality of care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract