Abstract 5213
Background
Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody monotherapy achieves poor outcomes in mucosal melanoma, but our previous study has demonstrated that primary malignant melanoma of esophagus (PMME) has a dramatically high response rate (ORR 75%). The genomic landscape of PMME and reasons for this finding have not been extensively investigated.
Methods
Whole exome sequencing were performed in seven treatment-naive PMME tumor samples and matched normal tissues, and genomic data of eight mucosal melanomas was obtained from the International Cancer Genome Consortium. Comprehensive profiling was performed to analyze the of genetic differences of PMME with mucosal melanoma.
Results
The mean depth of coverage was 268X (ranged from 100X to 400X), 1203 SNV/InDels were detected in seven PMME samples, with a mean value of 172 mutations. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 3.58 mutations/Mb (range 0.19-9.58 mutations/Mb), which was significantly than mucosal melanoma (P = 0.021). The mutation spectrum of SNVs displayed more frequency of T>A transition while less frequency of C>T transversion compared to mucosal melanoma. There were 36 genes found to be mutated in more than two PMME tumor samples, and the most significantly mutated genes were CFH (42.9%, 3/7) and MUC16 (42.9%, 3/7). Both BRAF and NRAS were only found in one sample, and no NF1, KIT and SF3B1 mutation were detected. In total, 671 CNVs were detected, and the most frequently amplification chromosomal regions were 10q and 1p, while most frequently deletion in 1q and 8q. Genetic aberrations were mainly enriched in RTK/RAS and WNT pathways.
Conclusions
The TMB is higher in PMME compared to mucosal melanoma, with the highest mutation frequency in CFH and MUC16. CFH has a critical role in the regulation of complement activation, and MUC16 has been reported to be associated with higher tumor mutation load and outcomes in gastric cancer. In summary, our study reveals that the genomic landscape of PMME is different from mucosal melanoma originates from other mucosal membrane sites, and indicates that CFH and MUC16 mutation might be associated with better response to anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in PMME patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University Cancer Hospital-Beijing Cancer Hospital.
Funding
Beijing Talents Foundation (2016000021223ZK18), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672696, 81402264).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract